Reopen mterm descriptions PR for editorial.

[Naarcha-AWS]

Description

Describe what this change achieves.

Issues Resolved

List any issues this PR will resolve, e.g. Closes [...].

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Changes Analysis

Commit SHA: 95bcb91
Comparing To SHA: 86e4789

API Changes

Summary

└─┬Components
  ├─┬_core.rank_eval:RankEvalMetricExpectedReciprocalRank
  │ └─┬ALLOF
  │   └─┬maximum_relevance
  │     └──[🔀] description (41757:28)
  ├─┬_core.rank_eval:RankEvalMetricBase
  │ └─┬k
  │   └──[🔀] description (41713:24)
  ├─┬_core.rank_eval:RankEvalMetricDetail
  │ ├─┬hits
  │ │ └──[🔀] description (41727:24)
  │ ├─┬unrated_docs
  │ │ └──[🔀] description (41722:24)
  │ └─┬metric_details
  │   └──[🔀] description (41732:24)
  ├─┬_core.rank_eval:RankEvalMetricPrecision
  │ └─┬ALLOF
  │   └─┬ignore_unlabeled
  │     └──[🔀] description (41771:28)
  └─┬_core.rank_eval:RankEvalMetricDiscountedCumulativeGain
    ├─┬ALLOF
    │ └──[🔀] $ref (41746:11)❌ 
    └─┬ALLOF
      └──[🔀] $ref (41710:13)❌ 

Document Element	Total Changes	Breaking Changes
components	8	4

• ❌ BREAKING Changes: 4 out of 8
• Modifications: 8
• Breaking Modifications: 2

Report

The full API changes report is available at: https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-api-specification/actions/runs/11521480264/artifacts/2105008127

API Coverage

	Before	After	Δ
Covered (%)	588 (57.59 %)	588 (57.59 %)	0 (0 %)
Uncovered (%)	433 (42.41 %)	433 (42.41 %)	0 (0 %)
Unknown	30	30	0

[github-actions]

Spec Test Coverage Analysis

Total	Tested
505	320 (63.37 %)

[natebower]

@Naarcha-AWS Please see my comments and changes and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!

[Naarcha-AWS]

@natebower: Feedback implemented. Let me know if I missed anything.

[natebower]

@Naarcha-AWS LGTM!

[dblock]

Can I merge?

[natebower]

Can I merge?

@dblock I'm assuming you should be good to go. Thanks!