Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Setting JobSweeper search preference against primary shard #485

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link

Backport c1e2569 from #483

* Setting sweepShard search request against primary shard

Signed-off-by: Joshua Palis <[email protected]>

* testing primary first

Signed-off-by: Joshua Palis <[email protected]>

* reverting back to primary

Signed-off-by: Joshua Palis <[email protected]>

* setting fail fast to false

Signed-off-by: Joshua Palis <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joshua Palis <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c1e2569)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #485 (8ac2d91) into 2.x (9107d41) will not change coverage.
Report is 1 commits behind head on 2.x.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                2.x     #485   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     29.08%   29.08%           
  Complexity       97       97           
=========================================
  Files            22       22           
  Lines          1186     1186           
  Branches        109      109           
=========================================
  Hits            345      345           
  Misses          819      819           
  Partials         22       22           
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...rg/opensearch/jobscheduler/sweeper/JobSweeper.java 39.74% <0.00%> (ø)

@cwperks cwperks merged commit f036f67 into 2.x Sep 6, 2023
9 of 11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-483-to-2.x branch September 6, 2023 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants