Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert remote publication method renaming in DiscoveryNode #16250

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

soosinha
Copy link
Member

@soosinha soosinha commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

Reverting the name of method from isRemoteStatePublicationConfigured to isRemoteStatePublicationEnabled since DiscoveryNode is marked as PublicAPI and so the renaming of method would be a breaking change.
The original change was pushed here : #16080

Related Issues

NA

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for b1047a6: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

✅ Gradle check result for d0b7d1a: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.02%. Comparing base (e7757e7) to head (d0b7d1a).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...search/cluster/coordination/CoordinationState.java 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #16250      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.97%   72.02%   +0.04%     
- Complexity    64771    64784      +13     
============================================
  Files          5302     5302              
  Lines        302473   302473              
  Branches      43699    43699              
============================================
+ Hits         217715   217842     +127     
+ Misses        66950    66772     -178     
- Partials      17808    17859      +51     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please link the PR in description where this change was pushed in?

@gbbafna gbbafna merged commit d7b0116 into opensearch-project:main Oct 10, 2024
35 of 36 checks passed
soosinha added a commit to soosinha/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
gbbafna pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
…igured methods (#16249)

* Separate Remote State and Publication enabled and configured methods (#16080)

* Separate Remote State and Publication enabled and configured methods

Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>

* Revert remote publication method renaming in DiscoveryNode (#16250)

Signed-off-by: Sooraj Sinha <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sooraj Sinha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants