Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump peternied/check-pull-request-description-checklist from v1 to v1.1 #12387

Conversation

peternied
Copy link
Member

Description

Bump peternied/check-pull-request-description-checklist from v1 to v1.1

Includes

  • Ignore items where the checkbox is part of the strike-through by @msfroh

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change 3ce03be

Incompatible components

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/flow-framework.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git]

Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for 3ce03be: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.remotestore.RemoteIndexPrimaryRelocationIT.testPrimaryRelocationWhileIndexing

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (94f79a2) 71.32% compared to head (3ce03be) 71.44%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12387      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.32%   71.44%   +0.11%     
- Complexity    59773    59804      +31     
============================================
  Files          4960     4960              
  Lines        281166   281166              
  Branches      40861    40861              
============================================
+ Hits         200548   200880     +332     
+ Misses        63965    63607     -358     
- Partials      16653    16679      +26     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@reta reta merged commit 69c08c8 into opensearch-project:main Feb 20, 2024
39 checks passed
@reta reta added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Feb 20, 2024
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-12387-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 69c08c8b87eba3d5fd25882ca5571f46e628d061
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-12387-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-12387-to-2.x.

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Feb 20, 2024

@peternied could you please backport to 2.x? thank you!

@peternied peternied deleted the bump-check-pull-request-description-checklist branch February 20, 2024 16:19
@peternied
Copy link
Member Author

@reta Doesn't need to be backported, this check is run on all PRs no matter the branch

@peternied peternied removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch backport-failed labels Feb 20, 2024
peteralfonsi pushed a commit to peteralfonsi/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
rayshrey pushed a commit to rayshrey/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
shiv0408 pushed a commit to Gaurav614/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
…v1.1 (opensearch-project#12387)

Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Nied <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants