Introduce code coverage collection to Cypress runs

[AMoo-Miki]

Description

• Introduce code coverage collection to Cypress runs
• Add coverage reporting to Cypress CI
• Enable Cypress tests to detect features of the OSD instance they are running against
• Turn on test isolation when security is disabled

Changelog

• test: Introduce code coverage collection to Cypress runs
• test: Enable Cypress tests to detect features of the OSD instance they are running against
• test: Turn on test isolation when security is disabled
• infra: Add coverage reporting to Cypress CI

Check List

• All tests pass
  • yarn test:jest
  • yarn test:jest_integration
• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• Update CHANGELOG.md
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 51.87%. Comparing base (15a19fa) to head (1dfcc23).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/osd-babel-preset/common_preset.js	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/core/server/http/http_server.ts	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (15a19fa) and HEAD (1dfcc23). Click for more details.

HEAD has 4 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (15a19fa)	HEAD (1dfcc23)
Linux_2	1	0
Linux_4	1	0
Linux_1	1	0
Windows_2	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9084      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.93%   51.87%   -9.07%     
==========================================
  Files        3809     3525     -284     
  Lines       91270    87361    -3909     
  Branches    14414    13796     -618     
==========================================
- Hits        55618    45321   -10297     
- Misses      32097    38993    +6896     
+ Partials     3555     3047     -508     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux_1	?
Linux_2	?
Linux_4	?
Windows_1	28.99% <50.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Windows_2	?
Windows_3	37.96% <50.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Windows_4	29.03% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[virajsanghvi]

lgtm, although looks like some ci are failing

[joshuali925]

would this fix #975?

[AMoo-Miki]

would this fix #975?

I think https://github.com/AMoo-Miki/Compatibility-Tester and https://tests.aws.barahmand.com/ deal with that better.