[2.10] bump version to next patch version

[kavilla]

Description

Bump from 2.10.0 to 2.10.1

Issues Resolved

#4584

Screenshot

Testing the changes

Check List

• All tests pass
  • yarn test:jest
  • yarn test:jest_integration
  • yarn test:ftr
• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• Update CHANGELOG.md
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5109 (f0f722c) into 2.10 (c1120d9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             2.10    #5109   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.47%   66.47%           
=======================================
  Files        3402     3402           
  Lines       64980    64980           
  Branches    10374    10374           
=======================================
  Hits        43197    43197           
  Misses      19219    19219           
  Partials     2564     2564           

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux_1	34.86% <ø> (ø)
Linux_2	55.19% <ø> (ø)
Linux_3	44.38% <ø> (ø)
Linux_4	35.05% <ø> (ø)
Windows_1	34.88% <ø> (ø)
Windows_2	55.15% <ø> (ø)
Windows_3	44.38% <ø> (ø)
Windows_4	35.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[joshuarrrr]

@kavilla What's the general plan with these? Are we expected to merge with all tests failing, or wait until the tests can pass?

[kavilla]

@kavilla What's the general plan with these? Are we expected to merge with all tests failing, or wait until the tests can pass?

Technically part of the post release activities, we are suppose to bump the patch version. Last time I am aware the patch version bump is requirement before artifacts are generated (OpenSearch and OpenSearch Dashboards).

So these version bumps will always fail based on the current expected release workflow. However, based on a plan for release improvements and decoupling I haven't yet posted. Fallback artifacts can be utilized. Patch versions are easy because it should be the most recent patch version release OpenSearch.

Minor will be ok but we will need to configure the dev only mode a little bit. So I would say yes the current expectation is that this will fail.

However, we are planning on making it a little bit better.