Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Jakarta annotation dependency when moving to Jakarta packages #487
Remove Jakarta annotation dependency when moving to Jakarta packages #487
Changes from 1 commit
0887bb8
db6dff5
84d4c4b
8aeb480
85d47bf
e4dac61
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Preconditions are the typical way to limit what files recipes operate on. That would look something like this
I'm not sure about the use of DependencyInsight here though, as we likely only want to remove the dependency if it's already available transitively. That might need some custom logic. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, not just found.
We need find in transitively "only", is this possible with DependencyInsight?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not right now; we do have an
onlyDirect
option on that recipe, but perhaps we'd need to add anonlyTransitive
:https://docs.openrewrite.org/recipes/maven/search/dependencyinsight#dependencies-in-use
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, guess we can only postpone this PR until DependencyInsight support
onlyTransitive
? 😢There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possibly yes. Although that might not be too difficult as we already know the depth there, since we add that to the data table we produce.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How?
Just like my comment 1. said, it's gone.
I can submit PR with the failed test if you want.