Beginnings of alert that combines alerts for comments and application…

…s in one email

maizzle/src/templates/alert.html

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+---
+title: 2 new planning applications near 89 Bridge Rd, Richmond VIC 3121
+<!-- TODO: Use first application for the preHeader instead -->
+preheader: "We found 2 new planning applications for you near 89 Bridge Rd, Richmond VIC 3121."
+bodyClass: bg-white dark-mode:bg-[#333]
+---
+
+<x-standard>
+  <table>
+    <tr>
+      <td class="w-1/2 xs:w-full xs:inline-block">
+        <p>Hello,</p>
+        <p>
+          We found 2 new planning applications for you near 89
+          Bridge Rd, Richmond VIC 3121.
+        </p>
+        <p>Thanks,<br>Planning Alerts team</p>      
+      </td>
+      <td class="w-1/2 text-right xs:text-left xs:w-full xs:inline-block">
+        <img src="images/dancing-man.png">
+      </td>
+    </tr>
+  </table>
+  <x-spacer height="32px" />
+  <x-divider space-y="24px" class="bg-slate-200" />
+  <x-application address="6 Kahibah Road, Umina Beach, NSW">
+    S4.55 to Modify Approved Dwelling and Garage including Deletion of Clerestory, Addition of Laminated Beam,
+    Relocation of Laundry, Deletion of Stairs and&hellip;
+  </x-application>
+  <x-divider space-y="24px" class="bg-slate-200" />
+  <x-application address="6 Kahibah Road, Umina Beach, NSW">
+    Building subdivision
+  </x-application>
+  <x-divider space-y="24px" class="bg-slate-200" />
+  <x-spacer height="16px" />
+  <x-comment address="6 Kahibah Road, Umina Beach, NSW" name="Martha" distance="800 metres">
+    <fill:description>
+      S4.55 to Modify Approved Dwelling and Garage including Deletion of Clerestory,
+      Addition of Laminated Beam, Relocation of Laundry, Deletion of Stairs and
+      Expansion of Workshop  
+    </fill:description>
+
+    <p>
+      It has recently come to my attention that a planning application has been submitted
+      for 813 Hight Street, Reservoir.
+    </p>
+    <p>
+      My concern is with the application for ground floor shops and nine (9) dwellings,
+      above, with a reduction in the car parking requirements.
+    </p>
+    <p>
+      Currently, there are already parking issues in the area, with insufficient parking
+      bays available. Residents of Wild Street and Henry Street are constantly complaining
+      about cars parked on "their" street. We often find abusive notes left on vehicles,
+      harassment of staff when in the street, and stupid acts of vandalism. We are a
+      business on High Street and staff already have difficulty finding parking as it
+      is. It appears that the council is not concerned for its local businesses or residents
+      and allowing a new building with reduced parking is irresponsible and inconsiderate.
+      I understand that the council and developers want to make as much money as possible but
+      it is extremely unfair to cause such distress and inconvenience to everyone else.
+      I strongly oppose such a development and would like further information as to how to
+      make this a formal objection.
+    </p>
+    <p>
+      Regards<br>
+      Louise
+    </p>
+  </x-comment>
+  <x-spacer height="16px" />
+  <x-button href="#">
+    <img src="images/pencil.png" class="pr-2">
+    Modify this alert
+  </x-button>
+  <x-spacer height="8px" />
+  <x-button.secondary href="#">
+    <img src="images/trash.png" class="pr-2">
+    Unsubscribe from this alert
+  </x-button.secondary>
+  <x-spacer height="48px" />
+</x-standard>