Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added dynamodb instrumenter for aws v1_11 sdk #12756
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Added dynamodb instrumenter for aws v1_11 sdk #12756
Changes from all commits
fceec97
647d433
fd2f694
9857868
3c0acac
70daf4e
61c014c
1b0a198
09e823a
d2b7fed
b86f2de
1a93d0d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is just an observation more than a request for a change - I understand that this attribute is a
List<String>
based on the spec, but it doesn't look like this code supports multiple table names, so it feels a little strange for it be defined that wayThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah we can likely make an additional enhancement that creates a Request Accessor for the methods that are tied to table names for the batch functions, and then add that Request Accessor to the logic for setting the value. Right now getTable is tied to getTableName which will always return one.