Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 using same code for cloudevents integration test #617

Merged

Conversation

skeeey
Copy link
Member

@skeeey skeeey commented Sep 11, 2024

Summary

Using same code for cloudevents integration test

Related issue(s)

#520

Fixes #

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.92%. Comparing base (ad42529) to head (db45ee9).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #617   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.92%   63.92%           
=======================================
  Files         180      180           
  Lines       14116    14116           
=======================================
  Hits         9023     9023           
  Misses       4191     4191           
  Partials      902      902           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 63.92% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@skeeey skeeey force-pushed the integration-test branch 4 times, most recently from 7d02fec to 3e0c264 Compare September 18, 2024 07:08
@skeeey skeeey changed the title [WIP] 🌱 using same code for cloudevents integration test 🌱 using same code for cloudevents integration test Sep 18, 2024
@skeeey
Copy link
Member Author

skeeey commented Sep 18, 2024

/assign @qiujian16

Copy link
Member

@qiujian16 qiujian16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qiujian16, skeeey

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 8a2a776 into open-cluster-management-io:main Sep 23, 2024
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants