Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EVM] add utility command to export EVM state #6561

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ramtinms
Copy link
Member

@ramtinms ramtinms commented Oct 11, 2024

The underlying ledger storage can be in any shape even if we use the same, code since the evm storage account can have cadence object deployed, the registers won't be exact match for comparision. We also use the registers to store block proposals etc which is not 100% related to the EVM state. Thus, we need a way to compare the EVM states.

Base automatically changed from ramtin/evm-add-iterators-to-base-storage to master October 21, 2024 19:15
@ramtinms ramtinms marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 21:22
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 63 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.11%. Comparing base (6a254ed) to head (f14e47a).
Report is 108 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/util/cmd/export-evm-state/cmd.go 0.00% 62 Missing ⚠️
cmd/util/cmd/root.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6561      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.14%   41.11%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        2031     2037       +6     
  Lines      179571   180152     +581     
==========================================
+ Hits        73886    74069     +183     
- Misses      99475    99867     +392     
- Partials     6210     6216       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 41.11% <0.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants