Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EVM Gateway node ops section and main page #1035

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

franklywatson
Copy link
Contributor

@franklywatson franklywatson commented Dec 10, 2024

Adds a new section to the Node Operations section of public docs covering EVM Gateway. This consolidates disparate EVM gateway doc info that was variously provided at:

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 11, 2024 6:25pm

@franklywatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

franklywatson commented Dec 10, 2024

@nialexsan - at some point could you please push this to a temporary vercel instance so we can review if the nav structure came out ok. Thanks

@nialexsan
Copy link
Collaborator

@franklywatson do you mean this page?
https://docs-git-jp-evm-node-ops-improvements-onflow.vercel.app/networks/node-ops/access-onchain-data/evm-gateway/evm-gateway-setup

@franklywatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes thanks @nialexsan !

[Ethereum JSON-RPC specification](https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/apis/json-rpc/) and is the only node type which accepts EVM
client connections.

The EVM Gateway is an unstaked, non-participating edge node which consumes Flow protocol state from the configured Flow Access Node
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do you say its non-participating? IMO, it participates by sending transactions. It doesn't participate in block production directly but does so indirectly.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll correct it to say it isn't a participant in block production, would that work?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants