Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow types to be removed in contract updates #3376

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions runtime/ast/memberindices.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ type memberIndices struct {
_attachments []*AttachmentDeclaration
// Use `EnumCases()` instead
_enumCases []*EnumCaseDeclaration
// Use `Pragmas()` instead
_pragmas []*PragmaDeclaration
}

func (i *memberIndices) FieldsByIdentifier(declarations []Declaration) map[string]*FieldDeclaration {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -150,6 +152,11 @@ func (i *memberIndices) EnumCases(declarations []Declaration) []*EnumCaseDeclara
return i._enumCases
}

func (i *memberIndices) Pragmas(declarations []Declaration) []*PragmaDeclaration {
i.once.Do(i.initializer(declarations))
return i._pragmas
}

func (i *memberIndices) initializer(declarations []Declaration) func() {
return func() {
i.init(declarations)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -184,6 +191,7 @@ func (i *memberIndices) init(declarations []Declaration) {
i._entitlementMappingsByIdentifier = make(map[string]*EntitlementMappingDeclaration)

i._enumCases = make([]*EnumCaseDeclaration, 0)
i._pragmas = make([]*PragmaDeclaration, 0)

for _, declaration := range declarations {
switch declaration := declaration.(type) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -225,6 +233,9 @@ func (i *memberIndices) init(declarations []Declaration) {

case *EnumCaseDeclaration:
i._enumCases = append(i._enumCases, declaration)

case *PragmaDeclaration:
i._pragmas = append(i._pragmas, declaration)
}
}
}
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions runtime/ast/members.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ func (m *Members) EnumCases() []*EnumCaseDeclaration {
return m.indices.EnumCases(m.declarations)
}

func (m *Members) Pragmas() []*PragmaDeclaration {
return m.indices.Pragmas(m.declarations)
}

func (m *Members) FieldsByIdentifier() map[string]*FieldDeclaration {
return m.indices.FieldsByIdentifier(m.declarations)
}
Expand Down
320 changes: 320 additions & 0 deletions runtime/contract_update_validation_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3060,3 +3060,323 @@ func TestRuntimeContractUpdateProgramCaching(t *testing.T) {
)
})
}

func TestPragmaUpdates(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()

testWithValidators(t, "Remove pragma", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#foo(bar)
#baz
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#baz
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
require.NoError(t, err)
})

testWithValidators(t, "Remove removedType pragma", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(bar)
#baz
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#baz
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.TypeRemovalPragmaRemovalError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "removedType pragma moved into subdeclaration", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(bar)
access(all) struct S {

}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) struct S {
#removedType(bar)
}
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.TypeRemovalPragmaRemovalError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "reorder removedType pragmas", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(bar)
#removedType(foo)
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(foo)
#removedType(bar)
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
require.NoError(t, err)
})

testWithValidators(t, "malformed removedType pragma integer", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#baz
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(3)
#baz
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.InvalidTypeRemovalPragmaError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "malformed removedType qualified name", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#baz
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(X.Y)
#baz
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.InvalidTypeRemovalPragmaError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "removedType with zero args", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType()
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.InvalidTypeRemovalPragmaError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "removedType with two args", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(x, y)
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.InvalidTypeRemovalPragmaError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "#removedType allows type removal", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) resource R {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(R)
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
require.NoError(t, err)
})

testWithValidators(t, "#removedType allows two type removals", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) resource R {}
access(all) struct interface I {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(R)
#removedType(I)
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
require.NoError(t, err)
})

testWithValidators(t, "#removedType can be added", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(I)
access(all) resource R {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(R)
#removedType(I)
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
require.NoError(t, err)
})

testWithValidators(t, "#removedType can be added without removing a type", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(X)
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
require.NoError(t, err)
})

testWithValidators(t, "declarations cannot co-exist with removed type of the same name, composite", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) resource R {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(R)
access(all) resource R {}
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.UseOfRemovedTypeError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "declarations cannot co-exist with removed type of the same name, interface", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) resource interface R {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(R)
access(all) resource interface R {}
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.UseOfRemovedTypeError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "declarations cannot co-exist with removed type of the same name, attachment", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) attachment R for AnyResource {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
#removedType(R)
access(all) attachment R for AnyResource {}
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.UseOfRemovedTypeError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})

testWithValidators(t, "#removedType is only scoped to the current declaration, inner", func(t *testing.T, withC1Upgrade bool) {

const oldCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) resource R {}
access(all) struct S {}
}
`

const newCode = `
access(all) contract Test {
access(all) struct S {
#removedType(R)
}
}
`

err := testDeployAndUpdate(t, "Test", oldCode, newCode, withC1Upgrade)
var expectedErr *stdlib.MissingDeclarationError
require.ErrorAs(t, err, &expectedErr)
})
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import (

"github.com/onflow/cadence/runtime/ast"
"github.com/onflow/cadence/runtime/common"
"github.com/onflow/cadence/runtime/common/orderedmap"
"github.com/onflow/cadence/runtime/errors"
"github.com/onflow/cadence/runtime/interpreter"
"github.com/onflow/cadence/runtime/sema"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ func (validator *CadenceV042ToV1ContractUpdateValidator) checkNestedDeclarationR
nestedDeclaration ast.Declaration,
oldContainingDeclaration ast.Declaration,
newContainingDeclaration ast.Declaration,
removedTypes *orderedmap.OrderedMap[string, struct{}],
) {

// enums can be removed from contract interfaces, as they have no interface equivalent and are not
Expand All @@ -755,6 +757,7 @@ func (validator *CadenceV042ToV1ContractUpdateValidator) checkNestedDeclarationR
nestedDeclaration,
oldContainingDeclaration,
newContainingDeclaration,
removedTypes,
)
}

Expand Down
Loading
Loading