Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

18 add another version of a simpleexample #21

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

kevin-delmas
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Please indicate whether this pull request [adds/removes/fixes/replaces] the [feature/bug/etc].

What type of pull request is this? (check all applicable)

  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation Update
  • Style
  • Code Refactor
  • Performance Improvements
  • Test
  • Build
  • CI
  • Chore (Release)
  • Revert

Related Tickets & Documents

Solving issue 18 add another version of a simpleexample
Add service graph export
Add semantics export

Added tests?

  • yes
  • no, because they aren't needed
  • no, because I need help

Added to documentation?

  • README.md
  • doc
  • no documentation needed

Not totally true, but documentation of minor feature addition could be considered in further evolution

Do we need to update pml analyzer version?

  • no
  • the pull request is only a bug fix, need a bug fix version update
  • the pull request add new features and ensures retro-compatibility, need a feature addition version update
  • the pull request is not ensuring retro-capatibility, need a major version update
  • not sure, I need help

Is this new version should be released as soon as possible?

  • yes
  • no
  • not sure, I need help

@kevin-delmas kevin-delmas requested a review from Gaudeval December 6, 2024 17:09
@kevin-delmas kevin-delmas self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@kevin-delmas kevin-delmas linked an issue Dec 6, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@kevin-delmas kevin-delmas added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gaudeval Gaudeval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Analysis results for MySys were reviewed by @cpagetti

rITFFile <- resultFiles.find(_.getName == s"${x.fullName}_itf_$i.txt")
rFreeFile <- resultFiles.find(_.getName == s"${x.fullName}_free_$i.txt")
} yield {
List(fileITF, fileFree)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this test done if the model x has less initiators than the reference? If it has more?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here the reference and the test must have the same number of initiator.
I can consider adding an assert to send a fail if the sizes mismatch

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have added assert ensuring that all references are available

@kevin-delmas kevin-delmas merged commit 320f87b into master Dec 12, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add another version of a SimpleExample
2 participants