fix(inline): fixes gemini-2.0-flash-exp code blocking #568
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks so much for adding this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I've been having issues with
gemini-2.0-flash-expreturning code blocks inline, despite the prompt not to. As well as bad classifications... This is an issue withgemini-2.0-flash-exp, not CodeCompanion. However I saw other people were having the same issue so thought I'd put out what's worked for me.This will manually strip out the code blocking if the model is set to
gemini-2.0-flash-exp. I have also added one more example to thePLACEMENT_PROMPTthat seems to help with classification a lot.Related Issue(s)
#536
Checklist
make docscommand