-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Templates for issues/pull tracker #99
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
c5478f3
186e521
2009162
22268cc
8896ef5
2506f5c
b443096
22d53bc
ffc9f45
a42e3d8
fd62f4b
85562ca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -2,31 +2,17 @@ | |||
name: Feature request | ||||
about: Suggest an idea for this project | ||||
|
||||
title: "REQUEST: " | ||||
labels: feature-request "P3 - Normal" | ||||
assignees: kreyren nntoan | ||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Having all issues assigned to ya'll may get a bit spamming in your inbox. I'd personally recommend against doing this.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This PR was made by the previous maintainers (they are still maintainers technically, but they became inactive), but I don't have a plan to merge this as is. Maybe I'll pick some parts from this PR someday when I create the templates, but I now don't see the necessity of the templates. |
||||
--- | ||||
|
||||
**I'm submitting a ...** (check one with "x") | ||||
- [ ] bug report | ||||
- [x] feature request | ||||
### Description/Abstract | ||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Reworked feature request because i think that this is more effective |
||||
<!-- Provide short, but verbose explanation about presented feature --> | ||||
|
||||
**Actual Behaviour** | ||||
|
||||
<!-- Describe how the bug manifests. --> | ||||
### Expected Behaviour | ||||
<!-- Provide Expected behaviour of presented feature --> | ||||
|
||||
**Expected Behaviour** | ||||
|
||||
<!-- State here what the feature should enable the user to do. --> | ||||
|
||||
**Steps to reproduce it** | ||||
|
||||
<!-- Add steps to reproduce bugs or add information on the place where the feature should be implemented. Add links to a sample deployment or code. --> | ||||
|
||||
**System information:** | ||||
|
||||
<!-- Add information about the system your facing this bug on. If you think this is irrelevant or if it's a UI bug or a feature request, please remove this section --> | ||||
``` | ||||
Your operating system | ||||
``` | ||||
|
||||
**Would you like to work on the issue?** | ||||
|
||||
<!-- Let us know if this issue should be assigned to you or tell us who you think could help to solve this issue. --> | ||||
### Actual behaviour (optional) | ||||
<!-- Optionally provide actual behaviour of presented feature --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As above, when the correct label is applied, I believe prefixing "REQUEST:" to the title adds unneeded distraction.