-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixes auto needs testing label #9025
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fixes auto needs testing label #9025
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/auto-testing-label.yml (2)
Line range hint
41-49
: Add error handling for API operations.The API calls could fail due to various reasons (rate limits, network issues, etc.). Consider wrapping them in try-catch blocks for better error handling.
+ try { await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: pr.number, body: 'Reminder: To add the "needs testing" label, comment "ready for testing" on this PR.' }); if (pr.labels.some(label => label.name === 'needs testing')) { await github.issues.removeLabel({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: pr.number, name: 'needs testing' }); } + } catch (error) { + core.warning(`Failed to manage PR labels/comments: ${error.message}`); + }
Line range hint
41-45
: Enhance the reminder message for clarity.The current message could be more informative about the workflow state.
- body: 'Reminder: To add the "needs testing" label, comment "ready for testing" on this PR.' + body: 'Changes have been requested. The "needs testing" label has been removed. Once you\'ve addressed the requested changes, please comment "ready for testing" to re-add the label.'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/auto-testing-label.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/auto-testing-label.yml (2)
41-41
: LGTM! Correct usage of the GitHub REST API.
The update to use github.rest.issues.createComment
follows current best practices for the GitHub Actions API.
Line range hint 41-49
: Verify the impact of label removal.
The automatic removal of the "needs testing" label on changes requested might affect other automation or tracking systems.
✅ Verification successful
Label removal is safe but consider documenting the behavior
The "needs testing" label is used in two workflows:
auto-testing-label.yml
: Manages the label addition/removal (current workflow)stale.yml
: Uses it as an exempt label to prevent PRs from being marked as stale
The removal of the label is safe because:
- The stale workflow only uses it as an exemption, so removal won't trigger any unintended automation
- The label can be re-added by commenting "ready for testing" as mentioned in the automated comment
- No other workflows depend on this label for triggering actions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other workflows or actions that might depend on the "needs testing" label
# Test: Search for workflows using the "needs testing" label
echo "Checking other workflow files for 'needs testing' label usage..."
rg -l "needs testing" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the "needs testing" label is used in stale.yml
echo "Content of stale.yml regarding 'needs testing' label:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "needs testing" .github/workflows/stale.yml
# Also check for any automation that adds this label
echo -e "\nChecking for automation that adds the label:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 'labels:.*needs testing|name:.*needs testing' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 2674
@rithviknishad nitpicks are good |
CARE Run #3821
Run Properties:
|
Project |
CARE
|
Branch Review |
rithviknishad/fix/auto-testing-label-not-commenting
|
Run status |
Passed #3821
|
Run duration | 04m 47s |
Commit |
cd9d382230: fixes auto needs testing label
|
Committer | Rithvik Nishad |
View all properties for this run ↗︎ |
Test results | |
---|---|
Failures |
0
|
Flaky |
0
|
Pending |
0
|
Skipped |
0
|
Passing |
125
|
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ |
Proposed Changes
eg: https://github.com/ohcnetwork/care_fe/actions/runs/11704100972/job/32595822027
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes