Prepare release artefacts #307
Conversation
* Errors to be fixed:
1. OBA:2045390 [basophil ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045390) appears to be equivalent to OBA:2045392 [basophil to leukocyte ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045392)
2. OBA:2045391 [eosinophil ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045391) appears to be equivalent to OBA:2045393 [eosinophil to leukocyte ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045393)
* resolution for release:
1. keep these:
- OBA:2045389 [leukocyte ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045389)
- OBA:2045390 [basophil ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045390)
- OBA:2045391 [eosinophil ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045391)
2. remove these:
- OBA:2045393 [eosinophil to leukocyte ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045393)
- OBA:2045392 [basophil to leukocyte ratio](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBA_2045392)
* explanation:
1. basophil is a leukocyte
2. eosinophil is a leukocyte
--> resulting in unintended equivalencies
|
OBA:2045393 eosinophil to leukocyte ratio - OBA:2045392 basophil to leukocyte ratio @rays22 Yes eosinophils and basophils are leukocytes but I think these ratios refer to total leukocyte count. |
The label suggests that, but the logical definitions do not express that unfortunately. The two classes cause a certain type of error (incoherence) in the ontology. For this reason, I have removed the two classes above, because they are unintended equivalent classes of other ones. The two classes could be reintroduced if we can come up with a pattern with an appropriate logical axiom. |
Remove unintended equivalencies