Added new 'response to' term #299
Conversation
| @@ -117,3 +117,4 @@ OBA:2050330 CHEBI:135983 teriparatide https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-4744 | |||
| OBA:2050333 CHEBI:31941 oxaliplatin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-4744 | |||
| OBA:2045298 CHEBI:145810 insulin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-2140 | |||
| OBA:2045299 CHEBI:17234 glucose https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-2140 | |||
| OBA:2050352 CHEBI:35526 hypoglycemic agent https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-4744 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be better to use the response_to_chemical_with_role_stimulus pattern template, because the CHEBI:35526 hypoglycemic agent is a subclass of CHEBI:50906 role and I would think that putting it into the response_to_chemical_stimulus_trait template should result in logical errors.
It is interesting that the QC did not catch it. How does owl:Nothing look like when you open oba-edit.obo in Protege?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think if you use theresponse_to_chemical_with_role_stimulus pattern, then the response to hypoglycemic agent will be a subclass of trait in response to drug, which it is not at the moment. Using a role entity in the response_to_chemical_stimulus_trait used to generate logical errors. It is strange it does in this case.
…m/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology into add_response-to-antidiabetic_term
issue #298