Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added check if there are atoms, but no +rt meta. #2986

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

c71n93
Copy link
Member

@c71n93 c71n93 commented Mar 20, 2024

Closes #2948


PR-Codex overview

The focus of this PR is to update error handling in the EO parser to enforce the presence of atoms with the +rt meta.

Detailed summary

  • Updated XSL file from rt-without-atom to rt-and-atoms
  • Added error handling for using atoms without +rt meta
  • Improved error message clarity

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

@c71n93
Copy link
Member Author

c71n93 commented Mar 20, 2024

@maxonfjvipon could you check this one, please?

<xsl:attribute name="severity">
<xsl:text>error</xsl:text>
</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:text>Using atoms without +rt meta</xsl:text>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@c71n93 let's make this message more informative, like "Using atoms without +rt meta is prohibited"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@c71n93
Copy link
Member Author

c71n93 commented Mar 20, 2024

@yegor256 could you check this one, please

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Mar 20, 2024

@rultor merge

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit eb40a6d into objectionary:master Mar 20, 2024
16 checks passed
@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Mar 20, 2024

@rultor merge

@yegor256 Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 22min)

@c71n93 c71n93 deleted the 2948-atoms-without-rt branch March 25, 2024 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rt-without-atom.xsl:26-27: Add check if there are atoms,...
4 participants