-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ssa): Deduplicate intrinsics with predicates #6615
Open
aakoshh
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
6533-dedup-intrinsic-side-effect
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+94
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2b46485
Comments
aakoshh 74b1c30
Allow deduplication of intrinsics with side effects with predicate
aakoshh f315410
Merge branch 'master' into 6533-dedup-intrinsic-side-effect
aakoshh 942ab3d
Fix docs
aakoshh 2a3c19a
Remove redundant comment
aakoshh 327b599
Remove prinln from examples in docs
aakoshh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a difference between these four and the previous ones?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment above
// As long as the constraints are applied on the same inputs.
this case also feels implied by "can_be_deduplicated"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The difference is in how much of the comments on the previous two don't apply on these. Basically followed the similar existing division in
has_side_effects
above. The ones in the first group are the ones I found appear inhandle_instruction_side_effects
inflatten_cfg
, so these are tied to the predicate by the virtue of having their input being multiplied with it.These others down here seemed related simply to applying assertions and constraints, which I assume work similar in that if you do the same constraint multiple times on the same thing then you can deduplicate. I hope this is true for
AsWitness
as well. I agree the comment above doesn't add any insight, I'll remove it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if we want to deduplicate
AsWitness
. It is telling our ACIR gen to generate a new witness variable, which isn't exactly the same as an assertion. cc @TomAFrenchThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I thought it might be enough to produce one witness for the same inputs, and hoped to clarify in the PR review with y’all
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think for the purposes of
std::as_witness
, it doesn't require that distinct witnesses are created so I'd deduplicate these.