-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
content(learn): update resources about typescript #6951
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
CC @marco-ippolito 👋 |
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
aduh95
reviewed
Jul 28, 2024
marco-ippolito
changed the title
content(learn): update ressources about typescript
content(learn): update resources about typescript
Jul 30, 2024
Co-Authored-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
AugustinMauroy
force-pushed
the
content(learn)-typescript
branch
from
July 30, 2024 08:55
9f0644b
to
215a5c7
Compare
AugustinMauroy
commented
Jul 30, 2024
aagamezl
reviewed
Aug 9, 2024
5 tasks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
overall this is an excellent primer, thanks @AugustinMauroy
I gave it a pass with a critical eye.
Co-Authored-By: Brian Muenzenmeyer <[email protected]>
AugustinMauroy
force-pushed
the
content(learn)-typescript
branch
from
September 14, 2024 13:13
acf8153
to
43f5c59
Compare
@bmuenzenmeyer I've applied your review. Thanks a lot. |
bmuenzenmeyer
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2024
github-actions
bot
removed
the
github_actions:pull-request
Trigger Pull Request Checks
label
Sep 15, 2024
Lighthouse Results
|
marco-ippolito
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2024
aymen94
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2024
joeeames
pushed a commit
to joeeames/nodejs.org
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
* content(learn): update ressources about typescript * adding important note * content(learn): update from feedback Co-Authored-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> * content(learn): remove global install of tsc * fix fails from github copilot fix fails from github copilot * fix: remove old stuff from navigation * update * update * Update from feedback Co-Authored-By: Brian Muenzenmeyer <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Brian Muenzenmeyer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Updating ressources about typescript
Validation
Related Issues
nodejs/node#53725 (comment)