Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing bug from package name. #2211

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

ussjoin
Copy link

@ussjoin ussjoin commented Sep 1, 2020

Package name as it currently stands is a racial slur that does not
describe the project. Since the project is self-described in README.md as
"Node.js native addon build tool", this commit changes all references to
"nnabt" to remove the bug.

Checklist
  • npm install && npm test passes
  • tests are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Description of change

Package name as it currently stands is a racial slur that does not
describe the project. Since the project is self-described in README.md as
"Node.js native addon build tool", this commit changes all references to
"nnabt" to remove the bug.

Package name as it currently stands is a racial slur that does not
describe the project. Since the project is self-described in README.md as
"Node.js native addon build tool", this commit changes all references to
"nnabt" to remove the bug.
@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Sep 1, 2020

duplicate of #2168, please take discussion there, and changes to "gyp" should be directed to https://github.com/nodejs/gyp-next as we vendor in the gyp/ directory and no longer consider other edits to that directory

@rvagg rvagg closed this Sep 1, 2020
@ussjoin
Copy link
Author

ussjoin commented Sep 1, 2020

This is incorrect. This is a PR, not just a feature request. Please reopen.

@rvagg rvagg reopened this Sep 1, 2020
@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Sep 1, 2020

Please isolate the changes in gyp/ from this PR, we don't accept changes to that directory here. Please also use #2168 to find resolution on this question. It's an ongoing discussion and while this might be a reasonable proposal, that's all it is and #2168 should be considered the place to find consensus.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Sep 1, 2020

And for what it's worth in terms of consensus, I'm -1 on this change.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Jun 22, 2021

Closing. Failing tests and too many conflicts.

@cclauss cclauss closed this Jun 22, 2021
@ussjoin
Copy link
Author

ussjoin commented Jun 22, 2021

Not fixed. Package still racist.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants