-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nf test #285
Nf test #285
Conversation
This PR is against the
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).docs/usage.md
is updated.docs/output.md
is updated.CHANGELOG.md
is updated.README.md
is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).I added an nf-test for metatdenovo . We should discuss whether we want to use the nf-core/fetchngs method or nf-core/rnaseq. both should be equally valid but they address the test differently. the latter uses snapshots while the other doesn't. which one is our method then? I personally prefer nf-core/fetchngs because it can avoid issues with tools like megahit for md5 files.