Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CalDAV fix search with limit and time range #45222
CalDAV fix search with limit and time range #45222
Changes from all commits
4718a7e
b769dc4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we limit to
VEVENT
s ?https://icalendar.org/CalDAV-Access-RFC-4791/9-9-caldav-time-range-xml-element.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well spotted, thank you 🙏
A user mentioned that the widget is not showing items from the tasks app anymore.
I assume that could be the reason.
What do you suggest, extending to VEVENT, VTODO?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At least, yes. However, from what I can see in the
validateCompFilters
implementation, you would need to call the method again with the same payload, only changing the name property, you can't add a secondcomp-filter
directly, which sounds…bad?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I took a look at the missing tasks / the VTODO handling and wrote down my findings at #45333.
It's more work than I imagined, and therefore I need to discuss it with Christoph.
Happy to have your feedback / pointers on that one ;)