feat(providers): Add Loops Email Provider and Documentation

[Whats-A-MattR]

☕️ Reasoning

Email / Magic Token Auth is great.
Loops.so make a great product for Email that goes beyond just transactional emails, I use them as my provider and love the platform.

🧢 Checklist

• Documentation
• Tests
• Ready to be merged

🎫 Affected issues

Fixes: This Feature Request

📌 Resources

• Security guidelines
• Contributing guidelines
• Code of conduct
• Contributing to Open Source

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
auth-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 12, 2024 3:09am

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
next-auth-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Nov 12, 2024 3:09am

[vercel]

@Whats-A-MattR is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[Whats-A-MattR]

Pls approve.

[ndom91]

Ah so after fixing some of the other build issues in the repo, it looks like there's still an issue with this PR / loops provider, see: https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/actions/runs/10983054627/job/30492001767?pr=11197

[Whats-A-MattR]

@ndom91

Ah so after fixing some of the other build issues in the repo, it looks like there's still an issue with this PR / loops provider, see: https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/actions/runs/10983054627/job/30492001767?pr=11197

yeah, I had implemented different types for Loops but you removed them in this commit

I've now resolved and build is working again - at least locally...

[Whats-A-MattR]

How about we get some merge happening @ndom91 @ThangHuuVu @ubbe-xyz
Should all be ready to go

[Whats-A-MattR]

How about we get some merge happening @ndom91 @ThangHuuVu @ubbe-xyz Should all be ready to go

bumping again

[Whats-A-MattR]

updating from base (again).

[Whats-A-MattR]

@ndom91 @ThangHuuVu @ubbe-xyz could we possibly do the thing now please?

[ndom91]

@ndom91 @ThangHuuVu @ubbe-xyz could we possibly do the thing now please?

Please don't tag maintainers directly 🙏

Regarding getting this in, are the extra types you added back really necessary? Look at how simple the other email providers are for example.

[Whats-A-MattR]

@ndom91 @ThangHuuVu @ubbe-xyz could we possibly do the thing now please?

Please don't tag maintainers directly 🙏

Regarding getting this in, are the extra types you added back really necessary? Look at how simple the other email providers are for example.

To include the transactionalId without the LSP complaining, type errors being thrown, and the build and test scripts failing I had to do the typing.

The other providers are unaffected as all I did was type the props of a function in the interface.