You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The T1w scan, although it is fast and robust for cord segmentation, is not robust for registration given the large anatomical differences in terms of contrast:
T1w
T2*w
I suggest replacing the T1w sequence by a 0.8mm isotropic SPACE sequence (see param here)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another alternative would be to acquire an MT-like sequence, which would also show similar contrast than the T2w*, and it would also be faster to acquire (~3min vs. 5min for T2 SPACE)
The T1w scan, although it is fast and robust for cord segmentation, is not robust for registration given the large anatomical differences in terms of contrast:
T1w
T2*w
I suggest replacing the T1w sequence by a 0.8mm isotropic SPACE sequence (see param here)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: