-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move GmsegChallenge
outside of sct-testing-large
#195
Comments
TLDR:
see participants.tsv
Each
And SC and GM seg:
However, the data I downloaded from the provided links contains differently structured derivatives. Namely, the WM seg from 4 raters is available for each subject:
This leads me to the idea of creating a new git-annex |
Thank you for the excellent detective work @valosekj
Indeed, we modified the original naming to be BIDS compatible. Also, we created GM and SC segs out of the WM segmentations because this is what we trained our models on.
I'm not a big fan of this suggestion, because it will duplicate data, which could cause methodological issues in the future. Eg: if a student trains a model using "sct-testing-large/*GmsegChallenge" and "gmseg-challenge", the same data could appear in the training and testing split. I would be inclined to discard the "sct-testing-large/*GmsegChallenge", and re-create the SC and GM labels (eg: by using flood filling algorithm to get SC, and then subtracting the SC from the WM mask). More details about the mask generation in the original paper from Prados et al. Neuroimage, in section "GM mask delineation". However, it would be good to contact the organizer (Ferran Prados) and ask how the GM and SC masks are generated from the WM masks, Because, e.g. if the GM mask touches the edge of the SC mask, then a flood-fill algorithm would fail. |
Thank you very much for the explanation!
I agree. Thus, the SC and GM labels can be easily re-created using simple thresholding. --> I will do it. |
I'm in favor of updating our conventions (also here) for derivatives/labels, see notably: sct-pipeline/fmri-segmentation#1. so, in this case, it would look something like this:
Sources: |
It sounds good!
I have used this convention in #199. Once we agree on that, I will update ivadomed and intranet websites. Based on "Derivative data types" section here, maybe we could use also |
Excellent idea. In this case, we could get rid of the
And I suggest changing |
After a discussion with @jcohenadad, we decided to move
GmsegChallenge
subjects outside ofsct-testing-large
.This will include the following steps:
sct-testing-large
dataset - removal ofGmsegChallenge
nii files and entries fromparticipants.tsv
gmseg-challenge
datasetgmseg-challenge
dataset (currently, there are only 50GmsegChallenge
subjects insct-testing-large
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: