[DOC] Update shortcuts in README.md

[alyssadai]

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• Removes unnecessary top-level Neurobagel API shortcut (was somehow added back in [ENH] Add consistent badges #387 👀)
• Update the license heading level so it's not under the default query section

Checklist

This section is for the PR reviewer

• PR has an interpretable title with a prefix ([ENH], [FIX], [REF], [TST], [CI], [MNT], [INF], [MODEL], [DOC]) (see our Contributing Guidelines for more info)
• PR has a label for the release changelog or skip-release (to be applied by maintainers only)
• PR links to GitHub issue with mention Closes #XXXX
• Tests pass
• Checks pass
• If the PR changes the SPARQL query template, the default Neurobagel query file has also been regenerated

For new features:

• Tests have been added

For bug fixes:

• There is at least one test that would fail under the original bug conditions.

Summary by Sourcery

Update the README.md by removing the redundant 'Neurobagel API' shortcut and adjusting the license heading to a top-level heading for better organization.

Documentation:

• Remove the unnecessary top-level 'Neurobagel API' shortcut from the README.md file.
• Update the license heading level in the README.md to be a top-level heading.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR updates the README.md file by reorganizing the table of contents and adjusting heading levels. The changes are implemented through simple text modifications in the markdown file, removing a redundant top-level shortcut and promoting the License section to a top-level heading.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Reorganize table of contents structure	Remove redundant 'Neurobagel API' top-level entry Adjust indentation levels of remaining entries to maintain hierarchy	README.md
Update License section heading level	Change License heading from H3 (###) to H2 (##) to make it a top-level section	README.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.09%. Comparing base (3fe810b) to head (4654fcb).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #391   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.09%   97.09%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines         861      861           
=======================================
  Hits          836      836           
  Misses         25       25           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @alyssadai - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[surchs]

🧑‍🍳