-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation for telent in oai #149
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for nephio ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
UPF_POD=$(kubectl get pods -n oai-core --context=edge-admin@edge -l workload.nephio.org/oai=upf -o jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}') | ||
UPF_tun0_IP_ADDR=$(kubectl exec -it $UPF_POD -n oai-core -c upf-edge --context edge-admin@edge -- ip -f inet addr show tun0 | sed -En -e 's/.*inet ([0-9.]+).*/\1/p') | ||
kubectl exec -it $UE_POD -n oai-ue --context edge-admin@edge -- ping -I oaitun_ue1 -c 3 $UPF_tun0_IP_ADDR | ||
kubectl exec -it $UE_POD -n oai-ue --context edge-admin@edge -- ping -c 3 $UPF_tun0_IP_ADDR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jain-ashish-sam I would say leave -I oaitun_ue1
to force ping to use that interface. I know to ping UPF it is not needed but for internet it will be needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I have updated it!
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: arora-sagar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jain-ashish-sam You also need to update |
@jain-ashish-sam Can you update the title of the PR and remove O1 from there and just keep telnet? Another thing can you explicitly mention in the PR description for the NF reconfiguration we are not using Nephio capabilities. |
@@ -711,25 +711,106 @@ The output is similar to: | |||
9496.571150 [GNB_APP] I [gNB 0] Received NGAP_REGISTER_GNB_CNF: associated AMF 1 | |||
``` | |||
|
|||
### Check Stats via telnet O1 Module |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you remove the term O1?
``` | ||
|
||
```bash | ||
O1_IP=$(kubectl get svc oai-gnb-du-o1-telnet-lb -n oai-ran-du --context edge-admin@edge -o=jsonpath='{.status.loadBalancer.ingress[0].ip}') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There shouldn't be any reference O1 - this is simply a telnet interface to the DU; not O1. The file is peppered with this misinformation. Minimally we should note that this is not a standard O1 interface but a proprietary telnet interface.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have removed the O1 reference
As far as " The current 004-ran-network.yaml is not deploying o1 enabled DU." is concerned, I will update the packageRevision in the "test-infra" once catalog repo is tagged. |
The documentation include:
Note: For Bandwidth-Reconfiguration, we are not using Nephio capabilities. We are planning it to add in the future