-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
!!! TASK: Streamline ContentGraph::findRootNodeAggregateByType
#5158
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -14,10 +14,7 @@ | |
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\Projection\ContentGraph\Filter\PropertyValue\Criteria\PropertyValueLessThanOrEqual; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\Projection\ContentGraph\Node; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\Projection\ContentGraph\VisibilityConstraints; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\Projection\Workspace\Workspace; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\ContentRepository\ContentRepositoryId; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\Exception\RootNodeAggregateDoesNotExist; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\Exception\WorkspaceDoesNotExist; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\Node\NodeVariantSelectionStrategy; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\Node\PropertyName; | ||
use Neos\ContentRepository\Core\SharedModel\Workspace\WorkspaceName; | ||
|
@@ -101,7 +98,7 @@ private function getNodesWithExceededDates(ContentRepository $contentRepository, | |
$sitesNodeTypeName = NodeTypeName::fromString('Neos.Neos:Sites'); | ||
$rootNode = $subgraph->findRootNodeByType($sitesNodeTypeName); | ||
if ($rootNode === null) { | ||
throw RootNodeAggregateDoesNotExist::butWasExpectedTo($sitesNodeTypeName); | ||
throw new \RuntimeException(sprintf('No sites root node found in content repository "%s"', $contentRepository->id->value), 1719047148); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Just wondering: Why don't we keep the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we are in a different package here (the timeable stuff) and its imo not needed here to have a special exception class. Its a not ever gonna happen case and just a save guard. |
||
} | ||
|
||
$nodes = $subgraph->findDescendantNodes( | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be the current behavior with the exception I guess? Or rather we might actually throw here to tell people that this site does not exist?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes we throw currently. But as we want to remove a child node either way it seems fine to say, well we cant remove a thing here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, skipping is the better behavior.
But maybe we could throw at the end of this method if no node was actually removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I dont think so. But with #4470 we can definitely discuss how the full behaviour should be and adjust edge cases.