Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QV score lower post dorado polish #1205

Open
HananAlmulla opened this issue Dec 31, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

QV score lower post dorado polish #1205

HananAlmulla opened this issue Dec 31, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
polish Issues related to polishing

Comments

@HananAlmulla
Copy link

Issue Report
I assessed the Q score of my assembly using YAK. the QV score of my draft assembly is 55 while that of the polished assembly using dorado polish is much lower (35).

Steps to reproduce the issue:

  1. convert POD5 files to bam file using dorado basecaller (v0.8.2) and SUP v5.0 model
  2. perform assembly using Hifiasm including recent --ont option (v0.23.0-r691)
  3. run dorado aligner
  4. run 'dorado polish` (v0.9.0)
  5. run yak count (v0.1-r56)
  6. run yak qv on both the draft and the polished asssembly

Run environment:

  • Dorado version: v0.8.2 for basecalling and v0.9.0 for polishing
  • Operating system: Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
  • Hardware (CPUs, Memory, GPUs): AMD® Ryzen threadripper pro 7985wx 64-cores × 128 - 256.0 GiB mem - NVIDIA GPUs
  • Source data type: POD5 files
  • Source data location: on device
  • Details about data (flow cell, kit, read lengths, number of reads, total dataset size in MB/GB/TB):
    • flowcell: PromethION R10 flowcell
    • kit: Native Barcoding Kit 24
    • read length: n50 is 4251 bp
    • number of reads: 14222718
@HalfPhoton HalfPhoton added the polish Issues related to polishing label Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
polish Issues related to polishing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants