Remove django-apptemplates. #118
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
davea
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2021
requirements-base.txt
Outdated
| stripe==2.35.0 | ||
|
|
||
| # Bulk lookup | ||
| xlrd<2 |
Recursive templates have been supported since Django 1.9, though only documented in 3.1.
dracos
force-pushed
the
remove-apptemplates
branch
from
20ba11a to
34ee023
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #118 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.23% 86.23%
=======================================
Files 48 48
Lines 2092 2092
=======================================
Hits 1804 1804
Misses 288 288
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recursive templates have been supported since Django 1.9,
though only documented in 3.1
Includes bits of the python3 branch which I should tidy up and PR, not sure why it wasn't, probably look at that first.