Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CAPE] Better non-expert facing language #434

Closed
ajparsons opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

[CAPE] Better non-expert facing language #434

ajparsons opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ajparsons
Copy link
Contributor

CAPE’s largest user group at the moment is ordinary members of the public - but this is a group the site is not well set up to cater for. It is missing handholding about what the site contains, our general theory about the importance of local government, and sign-posts to what we think people should do. For instance, the headline on the homepage could be:

image

Questions we could be giving answers to:

  • What is a climate emergency?
  • What is a ‘whole area pledge’?
  • But even bigger than that, what does the local government do?
  • What’s the relationship between citizens and councillors?
  • What’s the relationship between councillors and council ‘officers’?
  • What are these climate assemblies I’m hearing about?
  • I think we’ve got an election coming up next year, and my council doesn’t have a plan. Is there a website I can use to find out who my councillors are and write to them to say I am concerned by this?
@ajparsons
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://research.mysociety.org/html/joining-up/ would be a good guide to some of the stuff

@ajparsons
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also something not to do (covered a bit above talking about citizens) - that people are important

https://twitter.com/Bankfieldbecky/status/1580562526575554560

@JenMysoc
Copy link
Member

JenMysoc commented Oct 18, 2022

We would like @MyfanwyNixon to spend some time assessing the site and specifically considering changes that could be made to:

  • Public facing language
  • explanations of theory of change
  • how could we change the content
  • what could we do to bring in more people and help them use the site

@MyfanwyNixon
Copy link
Member

Here's a first pass through the site, from the POV of a layperson: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12WZob0F9Xsfi4H_y23097Scek0RRUqab8kUPWpXsRwo/edit#

Next I'll progress that into a list of actual actions.

@MyfanwyNixon
Copy link
Member

MyfanwyNixon commented Oct 26, 2022

Actions coming out of the document above - of course, these are not set in stone, but should be useful as a basis for discussion:

Redesign of homepage
This to include:

Council pages
These are already slated for a redesign. It should take into account:

Feature landing pages
eg https://data.climateemergency.uk/features/good-public-health/

  • Add an introduction which explains what information is on the page, and what people can do with it
  • Delete the columns that are irrelevant, ie 'has a plan' and 'declared an emergency'
  • Ideally, change the links so that they at least go tot he Scorecards part of the council page
    related: Turn “Features” page to a “Plans” page #416

Emissions reduction projects page
If this isn't already due a redesign or to be integrated differently, this page also needs:

  • An introductory explanation focusing on how to use the information
  • Ideally, links to the actual projects

'Our data' page

  • Complete rewrite with the content reordered in a way that makes sense, and copy to help people understand what it is /how they might use it

Overall
I'd love to come up with a way that makes people want to explore the site and take the actions we're planning on integrating, like writing to your councillors.

Can we offer any incentive for people who work through a kind of short online 'course' - which would be a mixture of videos, explainers and exercises that set them doing things like finding out their own council's plans in certain areas? At the end we could generate a certificate for them to download. I'm thinking about the GDPR training I did with Futurelearn, which did exactly this.

This is a kind of lightweight version of the incentive CE UK used to mobilise their volunteer markers of CAPs: you promise them upskilling in return for their time.

@ajparsons
Copy link
Contributor Author

ajparsons commented Mar 1, 2023

Does this ticket need a bit of clarification on the bits that only lucas can do, and what we want there? (Which I think is mostly the very structural stuff?)

I think the key structural stuff is these two tickets:

#420
#416

On actual content, I'd like to get us away from needing a designer to update a lot of that - and I think those tickets alone will take up the allocated time in the sprint.

@ajparsons
Copy link
Contributor Author

Generally, we've made progress on this, and have added more descriptions in more places. It is easier to tweak and add extra text if we feel we need to. Going to close this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants