-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CAPE] Better non-expert facing language #434
Comments
https://research.mysociety.org/html/joining-up/ would be a good guide to some of the stuff |
Also something not to do (covered a bit above talking about citizens) - that people are important https://twitter.com/Bankfieldbecky/status/1580562526575554560 |
We would like @MyfanwyNixon to spend some time assessing the site and specifically considering changes that could be made to:
|
Here's a first pass through the site, from the POV of a layperson: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12WZob0F9Xsfi4H_y23097Scek0RRUqab8kUPWpXsRwo/edit# Next I'll progress that into a list of actual actions. |
Actions coming out of the document above - of course, these are not set in stone, but should be useful as a basis for discussion: Redesign of homepage
Council pages
Feature landing pages
Emissions reduction projects page
'Our data' page
Overall Can we offer any incentive for people who work through a kind of short online 'course' - which would be a mixture of videos, explainers and exercises that set them doing things like finding out their own council's plans in certain areas? At the end we could generate a certificate for them to download. I'm thinking about the GDPR training I did with Futurelearn, which did exactly this. This is a kind of lightweight version of the incentive CE UK used to mobilise their volunteer markers of CAPs: you promise them upskilling in return for their time. |
Does this ticket need a bit of clarification on the bits that only lucas can do, and what we want there? (Which I think is mostly the very structural stuff?) I think the key structural stuff is these two tickets: On actual content, I'd like to get us away from needing a designer to update a lot of that - and I think those tickets alone will take up the allocated time in the sprint. |
Generally, we've made progress on this, and have added more descriptions in more places. It is easier to tweak and add extra text if we feel we need to. Going to close this one. |
CAPE’s largest user group at the moment is ordinary members of the public - but this is a group the site is not well set up to cater for. It is missing handholding about what the site contains, our general theory about the importance of local government, and sign-posts to what we think people should do. For instance, the headline on the homepage could be:
Questions we could be giving answers to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: