Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[utils] skip deep clone React element (v5.x) #44494

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

jukkatupamaki
Copy link

@jukkatupamaki jukkatupamaki commented Nov 21, 2024

Brings changes from #44400 to v5.x branch to fix #44278 also in v5.x.


@jukkatupamaki
Copy link
Author

jukkatupamaki commented Nov 21, 2024

@siriwatknp would this PR help in getting the deepmerge changes (#44400) to v5.x?

@jukkatupamaki jukkatupamaki force-pushed the fix/skip-deep-clone-react-element branch from 9d56911 to a140075 Compare November 22, 2024 06:31
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Netlify deploy preview

https://deploy-preview-44494--material-ui.netlify.app/

Bundle size report

Details of bundle changes (Toolpad)
Details of bundle changes

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against e4125f6

@zannager zannager added package: utils Specific to the @mui/utils package nextjs labels Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@DiegoAndai DiegoAndai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jukkatupamaki,

We'll prepare a v5.x release with this fix

@DiegoAndai DiegoAndai merged commit 006266d into mui:v5.x Nov 25, 2024
20 checks passed
@DiegoAndai DiegoAndai added the cherry-pick The PR was cherry-picked from the newer alpha/beta/stable branch label Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick The PR was cherry-picked from the newer alpha/beta/stable branch nextjs package: utils Specific to the @mui/utils package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants