Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
HM
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Marcello Seri <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
mseri committed Sep 23, 2024
1 parent 3400918 commit 8e15579
Showing 1 changed file with 13 additions and 5 deletions.
18 changes: 13 additions & 5 deletions hm.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1387,11 +1387,12 @@ \chapter*{Preface}
\end{equation}
where the non-boldface coordinates $\vb*{x} = (\vb*{x}_1, \ldots, \vb*{x}_N) =: (x_1, \ldots, x_{3N})$ stand for the coordinates of the $N$ points as a unique vector in $\mathbb{R}^{3N}$ and, again, we used Einstein summation convention.

If, for example, we consider a free one-particle lagrangian in cartesian coordinates $\vb*{x} = (x,y,z)$,
Consider, for example, a free one-particle lagrangian in cartesian coordinates $\vb*{x} = (x,y,z)$,
\begin{equation}
L = \frac 12 (\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 + \dot z^2),
L = \frac 12 (\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 + \dot z^2).
\end{equation}
in cylindrical coordinates $(r,\phi,z)$ it would read
You have likely seen in previous courses that in
cylindrical coordinates $(r,\phi,z)$ it would read
\begin{equation}
L = \frac 12 (\dot r^2 + r^2 \dot \phi^2 + \dot z^2),
\end{equation}
Expand All @@ -1400,14 +1401,21 @@ \chapter*{Preface}
L = \frac 12 (\dot r^2 + r^2 \dot \theta^2 + r^2 \sin^2(\theta) \dot \phi^2).
\end{equation}

The term $g_{kl} (q)$ should also ring a bell in the context of this example: the arc length $s$ of a parametrized curve $q(t) : [t_1,t_2] \to \mathbb{R}^3$, is computed as
In the example above, the metric in cartesian coordinates is given via the identity matrix, so $g_{kl}=\delta_{kl}$, while the cylindrical coordinates are $x(r, \phi, z) = r\cos\phi$, $y(r, \phi, z) = r\sin\phi$ and $z(r, \phi, z) = z$. You can use this not just to compute the langrangian in different coordinates, but also to read off the corresponding matrix elements $g_{kl}$ in the new coordinates.

The appearance of the $g_{kl}(q)$ term at the beginning of this section will probably ring a bell if you studied some riemannian geometry or general relativity.
Without going into the details of the theory, let's summarize some of the most important elements.
The so called \emph{arc-length} $s$ of a parametrized curve $q(t) : [t_1,t_2] \to \mathbb{R}^3$, is computed as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:arclen}
\begin{aligned}
s = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{\dd s^2} = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{g_{kl}(q)\dot q^k \dot q^l} \;\dd t,\quad
g_{kl} (q) = \left\langle\frac{\partial\vb*{x}}{\partial q^k}, \frac{\partial \vb*{x}}{\partial q^l}\right\rangle.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The strange looking object $\dd s^2$, called line element or first fundamental form, is just a short-hand notation for the $g$-dependent scalar product of generalized velocities that we obtained above\footnote{If you interpret $\dd q^k \dd q^l := \dd q^k \otimes \dd q^l$ as the tensor product of the two one-forms, then this is just the metric tensor $g$.}: $\dd s^2 = g_{kl}(q)\, \dd q^k \dd q^l$.
The strange looking object $\dd s^2$, called \emph{line element} or \emph{first fundamental form}, is just a short-hand notation for the $g$-dependent scalar product of generalized velocities that we obtained above\footnote{If you interpret $\dd q^k \dd q^l := \dd q^k \otimes \dd q^l$ as the tensor product of the two one-forms, then this is just the metric tensor $g$ in coordinates.}:
\begin{equation}
\dd s^2 = g_{kl}(q)\, \dd q^k \dd q^l.
\end{equation}
For example, in cartesian coordinates, we have
\begin{equation}
\dd s^2 = \dd x^2 + \dd y^2 + \dd z^2,
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 8e15579

Please sign in to comment.