⬆️ 🛠️(deps): update dependency ruff to ^0.8.0 #416
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![renovate[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/2740?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR updates the Ruff linter dependency from version 0.7.0 to 0.8.0 in the development dependencies. The update includes several breaking changes, rule removals, and new features as detailed in Ruff's changelog. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:
- It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!
- We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Change Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: This PR updates the
ruffdependency from version^0.7.0to^0.8.0. - Key components modified: The
pyproject.tomlfile. - Cross-component impacts: The update may affect linting rules and configurations used throughout the project, potentially requiring adjustments to existing code.
- Business value alignment: Ensures the project uses the latest version of the Ruff linter, which includes new features, bug fixes, and deprecations.
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: None.
- Component interaction changes: None.
- Integration points impact: None.
- Dependency changes and implications: The primary dependency change affects the linting process. Developers need to be aware of the new linting rules and adjustments.
2. Deep Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Analysis
pyproject.toml
- Submitted PR Code:
[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies] python-semantic-release = ">=8.0.8" -ruff = "^0.7.0" +ruff = "^0.8.0" pre-commit = "^3.3.1"
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change updates the
ruffdependency to version^0.8.0. This update includes several breaking changes, such as defaulting to Python 3.9, changes to the line width calculation, and the removal of deprecated rules. - Edge cases and error handling: Developers need to review the changes to ensure compatibility with existing code. For example, the new default Python version may require updates to the codebase to be compliant with Python 3.9.
- Cross-component impact : The update may affect how linting is performed, potentially requiring adjustments to existing configuration files or code.
- Business logic considerations : None.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change updates the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies] python-semantic-release = ">=8.0.8" ruff = "^0.8.0" pre-commit = "^3.3.1"
- Improvement rationale :
- Technical benefits: Ensures the project uses the latest version of the Ruff linter, which includes new features, bug fixes, and deprecations.
- Business value: Keeps the project up-to-date with the latest tools and practices.
- Risk assessment: Requires careful review and potential adjustments to existing code to ensure compatibility with the new linting rules.
2.2 Implementation Quality
-
Code Structure:
- Organization and modularity: The change is well-organized and modular, affecting only the relevant section of the
pyproject.tomlfile. - Design pattern adherence: N/A.
- Reusability aspects: N/A.
- Maintainability factors: The change is straightforward and easy to maintain.
- Organization and modularity: The change is well-organized and modular, affecting only the relevant section of the
-
Error Handling:
- Exception scenarios coverage: N/A.
- Recovery mechanisms: N/A.
- Logging and monitoring: N/A.
- User experience impact: N/A.
-
Performance Considerations:
- Resource utilization: N/A.
- Scalability aspects: N/A.
- Bottleneck analysis: N/A.
- Optimization opportunities: N/A.
3. Risk Assessment
3.1 Critical Issues
🔴 P0 (Must Fix):
- Issue: None.
- Impact: None.
- Resolution: None.
3.2 Important Improvements
🟡 P1 (Should Fix):
- Issue: The update to Ruff
^0.8.0includes breaking changes that may affect existing code. - Current Impact:
- Performance implications: None.
- Maintenance overhead: Requires review and potential adjustments to existing code.
- Future scalability: None.
- Suggested Solution:
- Implementation approach: Review the Ruff changelog and update existing code as necessary to comply with the new linting rules.
- Migration strategy: Test the updated codebase thoroughly to ensure compatibility.
- Testing considerations: Ensure comprehensive test coverage to catch any issues introduced by the update.
3.3 Minor Suggestions
🟢 P2 (Consider):
- Area: Documentation.
- Improvement Opportunity:
- Code quality enhancement: Document the changes and any necessary adjustments in the project's documentation.
- Best practice alignment: Ensure that the project's documentation reflects the latest practices and tools used.
- Documentation updates: Update the project's documentation to reflect the changes introduced by the Ruff update.
4. Requirements Analysis
4.1 Functional Coverage
- Requirements mapping:
- Implemented features: The update to Ruff
^0.8.0ensures the project uses the latest linting tools and practices. - Missing elements: None.
- Edge cases handling: None.
- Implemented features: The update to Ruff
- Business Logic:
- Use case coverage: N/A.
- Business rule implementation: N/A.
- Data flow correctness: N/A.
4.2 Non-functional Aspects
- Performance metrics: N/A.
- Security considerations: N/A.
- Scalability factors: N/A.
- Maintainability aspects: The change is straightforward and easy to maintain.
5. Testing Strategy
- Test Coverage:
- Unit test requirements: Ensure comprehensive test coverage to catch any issues introduced by the Ruff update.
- Integration test scenarios: Test the updated codebase thoroughly to ensure compatibility.
- Edge case validation: Validate edge cases that may be affected by the new linting rules.
- Quality Metrics:
- Current coverage: N/A.
- Critical paths: N/A.
- Performance benchmarks: N/A.
6. Final Assessment
6.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical Changes (P0):
[None] -
Important Improvements (P1):
- Review the Ruff changelog and update existing code as necessary to comply with the new linting rules.
- Test the updated codebase thoroughly to ensure compatibility.
- Ensure comprehensive test coverage to catch any issues introduced by the Ruff update.
-
Suggested Enhancements (P2):
- Document the changes and any necessary adjustments in the project's documentation.
- Ensure that the project's documentation reflects the latest practices and tools used.
- Update the project's documentation to reflect the changes introduced by the Ruff update.
6.2 Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: The update to Ruff
^0.8.0is straightforward but requires careful review and potential adjustments to existing code to ensure compatibility with the new linting rules. - Business impact: Keeps the project up-to-date with the latest linting tools and practices.
- Risk evaluation: Requires careful review and potential adjustments to existing code to ensure compatibility with the new linting rules.
- Implementation quality: The change is well-organized, modular, and easy to maintain.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #416 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 142 142
=========================================
Hits 142 142 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
^0.7.0->^0.8.0Release Notes
astral-sh/ruff (ruff)
v0.8.0Compare Source
Check out the blog post for a migration guide and overview of the changes!
Breaking changes
See also, the "Remapped rules" section which may result in disabled rules.
Default to Python 3.9
Ruff now defaults to Python 3.9 instead of 3.8 if no explicit Python version is configured using
ruff.target-versionorproject.requires-python(#13896)Changed location of
pydoclintdiagnosticspydoclintdiagnostics now point to the first-line of the problematic docstring. Previously, this was not the case.If you've opted into these preview rules but have them suppressed using
noqacomments insome places, this change may mean that you need to move the
noqasuppressioncomments. Most users should be unaffected by this change.
Use XDG (i.e.
~/.local/bin) instead of the Cargo home directory in the standalone installerPreviously, Ruff's installer used
$CARGO_HOMEor~/.cargo/binfor its target install directory. Now, Ruff will be installed into$XDG_BIN_HOME,$XDG_DATA_HOME/../bin, or~/.local/bin(in that order).This change is only relevant to users of the standalone Ruff installer (using the shell or PowerShell script). If you installed Ruff using uv or pip, you should be unaffected.
Changes to the line width calculation
Ruff now uses a new version of the unicode-width Rust crate to calculate the line width. In very rare cases, this may lead to lines containing Unicode characters being reformatted, or being considered too long when they were not before (
E501).Removed Rules
The following deprecated rules have been removed:
missing-type-self(ANN101)missing-type-cls(ANN102)syntax-error(E999)pytest-missing-fixture-name-underscore(PT004)pytest-incorrect-fixture-name-underscore(PT005)unpacked-list-comprehension(UP027)Remapped rules
The following rules have been remapped to new rule codes:
flake8-type-checking:TCHtoTCStabilization
The following rules have been stabilized and are no longer in preview:
builtin-import-shadowing(A004)mutable-contextvar-default(B039)fast-api-redundant-response-model(FAST001)fast-api-non-annotated-dependency(FAST002)dict-index-missing-items(PLC0206)pep484-style-positional-only-argument(PYI063)redundant-final-literal(PYI064)bad-version-info-order(PYI066)parenthesize-chained-operators(RUF021)unsorted-dunder-all(RUF022)unsorted-dunder-slots(RUF023)assert-with-print-message(RUF030)unnecessary-default-type-args(UP043)The following behaviors have been stabilized:
ambiguous-variable-name(E741): Violations in stub files are now ignored. Stub authors typically don't control variable names.printf-string-formatting(UP031): Report allprintf-like usages even if no autofix is availableThe following fixes have been stabilized:
zip-instead-of-pairwise(RUF007)Preview features
flake8-datetimez] Exemptmin.time()andmax.time()(DTZ901) (#14394)flake8-pie] Mark fix as unsafe if the following statement is a string literal (PIE790) (#14393)flake8-pyi] New ruleredundant-none-literal(PYI061) (#14316)flake8-pyi] Add autofix forredundant-numeric-union(PYI041) (#14273)ruff] New rulemap-int-version-parsing(RUF048) (#14373)ruff] New ruleredundant-bool-literal(RUF038) (#14319)ruff] New ruleunraw-re-pattern(RUF039) (#14446)pycodestyle] Exemptpytest.importorskip()calls (E402) (#14474)pylint] Autofix suggests using sets when possible (PLR1714) (#14372)Rule changes
invalid-pyproject-toml(RUF200): Updated to reflect the provisionally accepted PEP 639.flake8-pyi] Avoid panic in unfixable case (PYI041) (#14402)flake8-type-checking] Correctly handle quotes in subscript expression when generating an autofix (#14371)pylint] Suggest correct autofix for__contains__(PLC2801) (#14424)Configuration
ignores a rule that has been removed (#14435)lint.flake8-import-conventions.aliasesonly uses valid module names and aliases (#14477)Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.