Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump django-js-reverse from 0.6.1 to 0.9.1 #23

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 21, 2019

Bumps django-js-reverse from 0.6.1 to 0.9.1.

Changelog

Sourced from django-js-reverse's changelog.

0.9.1

  • Fix: avoid XSS introduced in 0.9.0 when using js_reverse_inline. A low threat as content injected is likely to be trusted input from the urlconfig.

0.9.0

  • New: Support for Python 3.7
  • New: Support for Django 2.2
  • New: Unit Tests Script prefix with no slash, changed URL Conf[#72](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/72) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/72>__
    Thank you graingert <https://github.com/graingert>__
  • Fix: "ROOT_URLCONF not taken into account" [#73](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/73) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/73>__ [#74](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/74) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/74>__
    Thank you LuukOost <https://github.com/LuukOost>__ and graingert <https://github.com/graingert>__
  • Refactoring: "move template logic to view" [#64](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/64) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/64>__
    Thank you graingert <https://github.com/graingert>__
  • Fix: "Now using LooseVersion instead of StrictVersion to avoid issues with rc releases" [#67](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/67) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/64>__
    Thank you kavdev <https://github.com/kavdev>__

0.8.2

  • Fix: A bug fix in Django 2.0.6 has broken django-js-reverse [#65](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/65) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/65>_
    Thank you kavdev <https://github.com/kavdev>_

0.8.1

  • Fix: The tests folder of the [#53](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/53) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/53>__ was still present in the build. => Added cleanup to the release make command.

0.8.0

  • New: Support for Django 2.0: [#58](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/58) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/58>_
    Thank you wlonk <https://github.com/wlonk>_
  • Fix: [#53](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/53) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/53>__ - Don't install the tests folder as a separate folder. Moved inside the django_js_reverse namespace.

0.7.3

  • New: Support for Django 1.10
  • Chg: Renamed "production" branch to "master"
  • Fix: [#48](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/48) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/48>_ - "Change False to 'window' in global object name in README."
    Thank you karamanolev <https://github.com/karamanolev>_
  • Fix: PR [#45](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/45) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/pull/45>_ - "Fix: collectstatic_js_reverse usage message"
    Thank you ghedsouza <https://github.com/ghedsouza>_
  • Fix: PR [#44](https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/issues/44) <https://github.com/ierror/django-js-reverse/pull/44>_ - "Remove duplicate get_url call"
    Thank you razh <https://github.com/razh>

0.7.2

... (truncated)
Commits
  • c3df4de bump v0.9.1
  • a3b57d1 Merge pull request #81 from ierror/fix-xss-when-using-js-reverse-inline
  • 78d6aff avoid xss when using js_reverse_inline
  • 0714391 new Maintainer: @​graingert
  • 5b13f85 optimized imports
  • dd88d9d Merge branch 'graingert-100-coverage' into develop
  • 523b761 integrated Unit Tests Script prefix with no slash, changed URL Conf #72
  • ef8693e Merge branch 'kavdev-bugfix/strictversion_is_too_strict_for_django' into develop
  • 1f7e65b leftover
  • 9cbd92c Fix: "Now using LooseVersion instead of StrictVersion to avoid issues with rc...
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants