Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #1144 #1145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

fix #1144 #1145

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

bobzhang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Suggestions Based on the git diff Output

  1. Potential Bug in Array::default Function:

    pub fn Array::default[T]() -> Array[T] {
      []
    }
    
    • The function Array::default is intended to return a default instance of an array of type T. However, the current implementation returns an empty array [], which might not always be the intended default behavior for all types T. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the caller expects a non-empty array or an array initialized with default values of type T.
  2. Typo in array_test.mbt:

    @json.inspect!(MX::default(), content={ "mm_num": [] })
    
    • The inspect! macro is used with @json.inspect!, but the macro name inspect! is repeated. It should likely be:
      @json.inspect!(MX::default())
      
    • Additionally, the content parameter seems redundant if it's just repeating the JSON structure that MX::default() would produce.
  3. Derive Usage in array_test.mbt:

    struct MX {
      mm_num : Array[Int]
    } derive(Default, ToJson)
    
    • The struct MX derives Default and ToJson. However, the Default derive might not work as expected since the default implementation for Array[Int] is not explicitly defined within the struct itself. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the derived Default does not align with the intended default behavior.
    • Consider explicitly defining the default value for mm_num within the struct or ensuring that the derived Default aligns with the expected behavior.

These observations highlight potential areas of concern that could affect the functionality and maintainability of the code.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3647

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.003%) to 82.721%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3646: 0.003%
Covered Lines: 4256
Relevant Lines: 5145

💛 - Coveralls

@bobzhang bobzhang merged commit 0930bce into main Oct 19, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@bobzhang bobzhang deleted the hongbo/array_default branch October 19, 2024 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants