Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade werkzeug from 2.1.2 to 3.0.6 #200

Closed

Conversation

billmetangmo
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
moto 3.1.4 requires werkzeug, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Directory Traversal
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Hey @billmetangmo, here are examples of how you can ask me to improve this pull request:

@Sweep Fix the CI errors.
@Sweep Add unit tests to verify that the application works correctly with Werkzeug 3.0.6, particularly testing for:
1. Directory traversal prevention (since this was one of the vulnerabilities fixed)
2. Resource allocation/rate limiting functionality (since this was another vulnerability fixed)

📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

💰 Infracost report

Monthly estimate generated

This comment will be updated when code changes.

@billmetangmo
Copy link
Member Author

❌ Plan Failed

CI link

Error: "name" cannot be longer than 64 characters: "mtchoun-mouh-snyk-fix-29315e2fc15de45288fdacf45438de1c-trigger_user_scan"
 
   with aws_cloudwatch_event_rule.scheduler,
   on main.tf line 326, in resource "aws_cloudwatch_event_rule" "scheduler":
  326:   name                = (terraform.workspace == "mtchoun-mouh-master") ? "trigger_user_scan" : "${terraform.workspace}-trigger_user_scan"
 

Operation failed: failed running terraform plan (exit 1)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants