Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README to mention how to set a GC plan #219

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

qinsoon
Copy link
Member

@qinsoon qinsoon commented May 17, 2023

This PR updates README about how to explicitly selecting an MMTk plan.

@qinsoon qinsoon marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2023 03:14
README.md Outdated
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ $ VO_BIT=1 make CONF=linux-x86_64-normal-server-$DEBUG_LEVEL THIRD_PARTY_HEAP=$P

## Test

We support most MMTk GC plans in OpenJDK, such as `SemiSpace`, `Immix`, `GenImmix`, `StickyImmix`, `GenCopy`, `MarkCompact`, `MarkSweep`, `PageProtect`, and `NoGC`.
When you run with the OpenJDK build from previous steps, you can choose one of the plans by setting an environment variable `MMTK_PLAN`. In the following examples, we use
the generational immix plan, `GenImmix`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should mention how to find out the plan available by linking to mmtk-core code?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can expose some information via, for example, java --version or -XX:ShowMmtkPlans, by printing out all plans supported by the OpenJDK binding, and/or all available plans in mmtk-core.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants