Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AP-5648: Fix bug on merits CYA page #7550

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

agoldstone93
Copy link
Contributor

What

Link to story

Update conditional to add additional client involvement type. This means that if a special children act proceeding has a client involvement type of applicant, the correct info will now be shown on the check your answers page

Checklist

Before you ask people to review this PR:

  • Tests and rubocop should be passing: bundle exec rake
  • Github should not be reporting conflicts; you should have recently run git rebase main.
  • The standards in the Git Workflow document on Confluence should be followed
  • There should be no unnecessary whitespace changes. These make diffs harder to read and conflicts more likely.
  • The PR description should say what you changed and why, with a link to the JIRA story.
  • You should have looked at the diff against main and ensured that nothing unexpected is included in your changes.
  • You should have checked that the commit messages say why the change was made.

Update conditional to add additional client involvement type. This means that
if a special children act proceeding has a client involvement type of
applicant, the correct info will now be shown on the check your answers
page
@agoldstone93 agoldstone93 marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2024 09:24
@agoldstone93 agoldstone93 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2024 09:24
@jsugarman jsugarman merged commit b7cee4d into main Dec 30, 2024
16 checks passed
@jsugarman jsugarman deleted the ap-5648-merits-questions-for-sca-not-shown-on-cya branch December 30, 2024 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants