Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#19921 [Dup] LLC Core count calculations updated #20171

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

YUNQIUGUO
Copy link
Contributor

Description

See #19921 Just to address one comment: #19921 (comment)

since this is an external branch. need to open another pull request for this.

Motivation and Context

jchen351
jchen351 previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2024
jchen351
jchen351 previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2024
@YUNQIUGUO
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for reformatting @jchen351 !

sophies927
sophies927 previously approved these changes Apr 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sophies927 sophies927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jchen351 jchen351 dismissed stale reviews from sophies927 and themself via 7bd6e6f April 2, 2024 19:19
Copy link
Contributor

@sophies927 sophies927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@YUNQIUGUO
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run Linux CPU Minimal Build E2E CI Pipeline

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@YUNQIUGUO YUNQIUGUO merged commit 19793de into main Apr 2, 2024
93 of 95 checks passed
@YUNQIUGUO YUNQIUGUO deleted the spampana95/main branch April 2, 2024 23:53
YUNQIUGUO added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2024
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->

See #19921 Just to address one comment:
#19921 (comment)

since this is an external branch. need to open another pull request for
this.

### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Sai Kishan Pampana <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: rachguo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jian Chen <[email protected]>
@A-Satti
Copy link
Contributor

A-Satti commented Apr 11, 2024

@jchen351 The flag was added back, considering its position in the code this wont have an effect without the additional conditionals. To avoid confusion and cleanliness I suggest removing the flag, in the build file.

We don't expect those building ORT to need additional knowledge of the platform to get the best performance.

TedThemistokleous pushed a commit to TedThemistokleous/onnxruntime that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
…20171)

### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->

See microsoft#19921 Just to address one comment:
microsoft#19921 (comment)

since this is an external branch. need to open another pull request for
this.

### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Sai Kishan Pampana <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: rachguo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jian Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants