Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python ADO packaging pipeline #118

Merged
merged 136 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Python ADO packaging pipeline #118

merged 136 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

jchen351
Copy link
Contributor

@jchen351 jchen351 commented Feb 24, 2024

This pull request includes changes to several files in the project. The changes are mainly related to the build and packaging configurations for the project. The most important changes include:

Changes to the build process:

Changes to the packaging configurations:

Other changes:

@jchen351 jchen351 requested a review from snnn March 1, 2024 23:28
@jchen351 jchen351 changed the title Cjian/py Python ADO packaging pipeline Mar 1, 2024
@jchen351 jchen351 requested a review from snnn March 2, 2024 01:10
jchen351 added 15 commits March 3, 2024 12:09
…03bd87/resourcegroups/proj-onnxruntime-dev/providers/Microsoft.ManagedIdentity/userAssignedIdentities/ortcibuild_readonly
# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/linux-cpu-arm64-build.yml
#	.github/workflows/linux-gpu-x64-build.yml
    displayName: 'Run BinSkim'
    inputs:
      AnalyzeTargetGlob: '$(Build.SourcesDirectory)\**\*onnxruntime-genai*.dll'
    continueOnError: true
# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/linux-cpu-arm64-build.yml
#	.github/workflows/linux-cpu-x64-build.yml
#	.github/workflows/linux-gpu-x64-build.yml
#	cmake/options.cmake
.gdn/.gdntsa Show resolved Hide resolved
@jchen351 jchen351 merged commit af5ef1a into main Mar 4, 2024
12 checks passed
@jchen351 jchen351 deleted the Cjian/py branch March 4, 2024 19:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants