[Cherry-pick] MfciPkg: Added information about the dependency on MuVarPolicyFoundationDxe #448
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…icrosoft#378) ## Description Mfci has a soft dependency on MuVarPolicyFoundationDxe. The phase based variables (Target\Manufacturer, Target\Product, Target\SerialNumber, Target\OEM_01 and Target\OEM_02) are locked using RegisterVarStateVariablePolicy. Adding documentation to explicitly call out the need for the MsCorePkg's MuVarPolicyFoundationDxe to enable phase based locking. - [ ] Impacts functionality? - **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions? - Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ... - [ ] Impacts security? - **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware? - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ... - [ ] Breaking change? - **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior? - Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ... - [ ] Includes tests? - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code? - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ... - [x] Includes documentation? - **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)? - Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ... ## How This Was Tested Ran CI locally ## Integration Instructions n/a
github-actions
bot
added
impact:non-functional
makubacki
approved these changes
Feb 29, 2024
TaylorBeebe
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Mfci has a soft dependency on MuVarPolicyFoundationDxe. The phase based variables (Target\Manufacturer, Target\Product, Target\SerialNumber, Target\OEM_01 and Target\OEM_02) are locked using
RegisterVarStateVariablePolicy.
Adding documentation to explicitly call out the need for the MsCorePkg's MuVarPolicyFoundationDxe to enable phase based locking.
flow, or firmware?
in build or boot behavior?
a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
on an a separate Web page, ...
How This Was Tested
Ran CI locally
Integration Instructions
n/a