[CHERRY-PICK] Add StackCheckLib Instances to Platform DSC Files (#446) #447
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
apop5
approved these changes
Feb 29, 2024
Javagedes
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
## Description
An instance of StackCheckLib must be in each DSC to accommodate
-fstack-protector and /GS flags.
- [x] Impacts functionality?
- **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware
functions?
- Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm,
...
- [ ] Impacts security?
- **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an
application,
flow, or firmware?
- Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter
validation improvement, ...
- [ ] Breaking change?
- **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a
break
in build or boot behavior?
- Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo,
call
a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
- [ ] Includes tests?
- **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code?
- Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
- [ ] Includes documentation?
- **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation
additions
outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
- Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to
documentation
on an a separate Web page, ...
## How This Was Tested
Tested in pipelines
## Integration Instructions
N/A
TaylorBeebe
force-pushed
the
update_stack_cookie_libs_2311
branch
from
eaeb9de to
8bad76c
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/202311 #447 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage 12.11% 12.11%
===============================================
Files 110 110
Lines 19024 19024
Branches 1735 1735
===============================================
Hits 2305 2305
Misses 16687 16687
Partials 32 32
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
An instance of StackCheckLib must be in each DSC to accommodate -fstack-protector and /GS flags.
flow, or firmware?
in build or boot behavior?
a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
on an a separate Web page, ...
How This Was Tested
Tested in pipelines
Integration Instructions
N/A