Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kernel-uki: drop dbus in initrd #10311

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

jozzsi
Copy link
Contributor

@jozzsi jozzsi commented Aug 31, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

dbus is known to have limitations and usually only gets included for either networking or bluetooth support.
Please see dracutdevs/dracut#2378 and dracut-ng/dracut-ng#60 .

Does this affect the toolchain?

YES

Test Methodology

@ddstreet @trungams - would you please be able to help testing this change given the concerns ? If dbus indeed can be dropped, than it should be dropped and I can finish up the PR with the rest of the changes.

@trungams
Copy link
Member

@jozzsi Change looks good to me. No issue in our initrd

@jozzsi jozzsi closed this Sep 11, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Tools Schema Changes to image configurations security labels Sep 11, 2024
@jozzsi jozzsi reopened this Sep 11, 2024
@jozzsi jozzsi requested review from a team as code owners September 11, 2024 01:07
@trungams
Copy link
Member

@trungams
Copy link
Member

trungams commented Sep 12, 2024

@jozzsi there seems to be a conflict as another PR that went in also bumped the kernel version. Could you bump the release version to 4 5?

@jozzsi
Copy link
Contributor Author

jozzsi commented Sep 12, 2024

@jozzsi there seems to be a conflict as another PR that went in also bumped the kernel version. Could you bump the release version to 4 5?

Sorry, but this process is too much overhead for me as now it also needs a rebase. Feel free to close this PR or take it over.

@trungams
Copy link
Member

No problem. I can take over the PR. Thank you for the change!

@trungams trungams changed the base branch from 3.0-dev to tvuong/3.0-dev/uki-remove-dbus September 13, 2024 22:55
@trungams trungams merged commit fa3bcb0 into microsoft:tvuong/3.0-dev/uki-remove-dbus Sep 13, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Packaging Schema Changes to image configurations security Tools
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants