Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: turn autofill on #1037

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

fix: turn autofill on #1037

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

emilyjablonski
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR addresses #1022

  • Addresses the issue in full
  • Addresses only certain aspects of the issue

Description

Turns autofill back on now that the household member relationship script has been run

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

Ensure you can get to the autofill page!

Author Checklist:

Review Process:

  • Read and understand the issue
  • Ensure the author has added QA notes
  • Review the code itself from a style point of view
  • Pull the changes down locally and test that the acceptance criteria is met
  • Either (1) explicitly ask a clarifying question, (2) request changes, or (3) approve the PR, even if there are very small remaining changes, if you don't need to re-review after the updates

Copy link
Collaborator

@ludtkemorgan ludtkemorgan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good assuming the tests pass!

@ludtkemorgan ludtkemorgan added ready to merge Should be applied when a PR has been reviewed and approved and removed 1 review needed labels Jan 8, 2025
@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski merged commit 6f4bb63 into main Jan 15, 2025
16 checks passed
@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski deleted the autofill-on branch January 15, 2025 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge Should be applied when a PR has been reviewed and approved
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants