oscal-cli resolve --relative-to=URI #88
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractDeprecatedOscalValidationSubcommand.java (1)
18-21: Consider adding @deprecated annotationThe documentation clearly indicates this is a deprecated class. Consider adding the
@Deprecatedannotation to provide compile-time deprecation warnings and IDE support.+@Deprecated(since = "1.0", forRemoval = true) /** * This abstract command implementation provides user feedback about extending * command being deprecated in favor of the {@link ValidateCommand}. */ public abstract class AbstractDeprecatedOscalValidationSubcommandsrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ListAllowedValuesCommand.java (3)
Line range hint
91-93: Fix incorrect command description.The current description "Generate a diagram for the provided Metaschema module" is incorrect for a command that lists allowed values constraints.
@Override public String getDescription() { - return "Generate a diagram for the provided Metaschema module"; + return "List allowed values constraints for the provided Metaschema module"; }
Line range hint
127-132: Enhance error message for binding context initialization failure.While the error handling is good, the error message could be more specific about what failed during initialization.
} catch (RuntimeException ex) { throw new CommandExecutionException(ExitCode.RUNTIME_ERROR, - String.format("Unable to initialize the binding context. %s", ex.getLocalizedMessage()), + String.format("Failed to initialize OSCAL binding context with constraint sets. Details: %s", ex.getLocalizedMessage()), ex); }
Line range hint
185-193: Consider implementing or removing commented-out metapath filtering code.The commented-out code block suggests incomplete functionality for metapath filtering. If this feature is planned, consider creating a tracking issue.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of metapath filtering functionality?
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/poam/PlanOfActionsAndMilestonesCommand.java (1)
23-23: Consider documenting or implementing the commented-out RenderSubcommandThe commented-out
RenderSubcommandsuggests incomplete or planned functionality.Would you like me to:
- Create an issue to track the implementation of
RenderSubcommand?- Help implement the
RenderSubcommandif it's ready for implementation?src/main/assembly/component.xml (4)
Line range hint
8-8: Consider removing the leading slash from outputDirectoryThe leading slash in
/libmight cause issues in Windows environments. Consider usinglibinstead for better cross-platform compatibility.- <outputDirectory>/lib</outputDirectory> + <outputDirectory>lib</outputDirectory>
Line range hint
19-46: Standardize path handling across fileSetsFor consistency and cross-platform compatibility, consider removing leading slashes from all outputDirectory paths.
- <outputDirectory>/</outputDirectory> + <outputDirectory></outputDirectory>
Line range hint
49-60: Remove commented configurationThe commented-out
excludessection should be removed if it's not needed. If it's for future use, consider documenting it in a separate file or issue.-<!-- <excludes> --> -<!-- <exclude>${artifact}</exclude> --> -<!-- </excludes> -->
Line range hint
1-61: Overall structure looks good with some architectural considerationsThe transition to the component format and the overall structure are well-implemented. Consider the following architectural points:
- Document the rationale for the component format transition in the project's documentation
- Create a migration guide for downstream projects
- Consider adding a schema version property in the pom.xml for easier future upgrades
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentresults/AssessmentResultsCommand.java (2)
10-13: Consider enhancing class documentation with more details.The documentation could be more informative by including:
- List of supported operations (validate, convert)
- Brief explanation of what OSCAL assessment results are
- Link to OSCAL documentation for further reference
/** * A parent command implementation that organizes commands related to an OSCAL * assessment results. + * + * Supported operations: + * - validate: Validates an OSCAL assessment results file + * - convert: Converts assessment results between different formats + * + * @see <a href="https://pages.nist.gov/OSCAL/concepts/layer/assessment/assessment-results/">OSCAL Assessment Results</a> */
18-20: Enhance constructor documentation with initialization details.The constructor documentation should describe what command handlers are initialized and their purposes.
/** * Construct a new parent command. + * + * Initializes the following command handlers: + * - ValidateSubcommand: For validating assessment results + * - ConvertSubcommand: For format conversion operations */src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ssp/SystemSecurityPlanCommand.java (1)
Line range hint
21-25: Consider adding support for relative paths in subcommands.Given that this PR aims to add
--relative-to=URIsupport, consider whether any of the subcommands (ValidateSubcommand,ConvertSubcommand) need to be updated to handle relative paths consistently.src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/metaschema/MetaschemaCommand.java (1)
11-14: Enhance class-level documentationWhile the Javadoc is clear, it could be more descriptive about the specific Metaschema operations this command organizes.
Consider expanding the documentation:
/** * A parent command implementation that organizes commands related to Metaschema * operations. + * + * This command serves as a container for various Metaschema-related subcommands, + * providing a hierarchical structure for operations such as validation, + * transformation, or other Metaschema-specific tasks. */src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractResolveCommand.java (1)
175-183: Enhance error message in URI relativization.While the implementation is correct, consider improving the error handling in the lambda function to provide more context about which URI failed to relativize.
(uri, src) -> { try { return UriUtils.relativize(relativeTo, src.resolve(uri), true); } catch (URISyntaxException ex) { - throw new IllegalArgumentException(ex); + throw new IllegalArgumentException( + String.format("Failed to relativize URI '%s' against base '%s': %s", + uri, relativeTo, ex.getMessage()), ex); } });src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/catalog/CatalogCommand.java (1)
23-23: Document or remove commented codeThe commented out
RenderSubcommandline should either be removed if it's no longer needed or documented with a TODO explaining why it's commented out and when it will be implemented.src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentplan/AssessmentPlanCommand.java (1)
10-13: Consider enhancing shared documentationThe documentation pattern is consistent with other command classes, which is good. Consider enhancing it with:
@sincetag to track when these commands were introduced- Examples of command usage
- Links to relevant OSCAL documentation
Also applies to: 18-20
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/profile/ProfileCommand.java (1)
10-13: Document the resolve command functionalitySince this PR adds new functionality to the resolve command, consider enhancing the class documentation to mention the profile resolution capabilities, including the new relative path feature.
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/componentdefinition/ComponentDefinitionCommand.java (1)
Line range hint
23-25: Address commented out code.The commented out line
// addCommandHandler(new RenderSubcommand());should either be removed or implemented if needed.src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/poam/ConvertSubcommand.java (1)
13-18: Add @deprecated annotation to complement the Javadoc.While the deprecation notice in the Javadoc is clear, it's recommended to also add the
@Deprecatedannotation to the class for better tooling support and compile-time warnings./** * Provides an OSCAL content conversion command. * <p> * This executor provides user feedback stating that this command is deprecated * in favor of the {@link ConvertCommand}. */ +@Deprecated(since = "1.0.0", forRemoval = true) public class ConvertSubcommandsrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentresults/ValidateSubcommand.java (1)
32-32: LGTM! Completes consistent framework updateThe removal of
SAXExceptioncompletes the consistent pattern of exception handling changes across all validation commands. This simplification improves API clarity while maintaining the same validation functionality.Consider documenting this exception handling change in the framework's technical documentation to help future contributors understand how XML parsing exceptions are now handled internally.
src/main/java-templates/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/OscalCliVersion.java (1)
36-42: LGTM: Improved encapsulation through visibility changesGood change to make the constants private since they are already exposed through the interface methods. This follows the principle of encapsulation and information hiding.
Consider adding
@Valueannotations to document the Maven property placeholders:/** The application name */ @Value("${project.name}") private static final String NAME = "oscal-cli";CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)
3-3: Enhance readability with minor grammatical improvementsThe addition of this introductory statement effectively sets clear expectations for contributors. Consider these minor grammatical improvements:
-The following is offered as standard code of conduct to which all contributors are assumed to be committed. +The following is offered as a standard code of conduct, to which all contributors are assumed to be committed.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~3-~3: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...of Conduct The following is offered as standard code of conduct to which all contributo...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
[uncategorized] ~3-~3: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ollowing is offered as standard code of conduct to which all contributors are assumed t...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🛑 Comments failed to post (10)
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentresults/AssessmentResultsCommand.java (1)
22-24: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide a final response:
Remove commented-out RenderSubcommand code across all command classes
The RenderSubcommand appears to be commented out consistently across 7 different command classes, but there's no implementation of this subcommand in the codebase. The project's README also doesn't mention any rendering functionality in its feature list, which only includes converting, validating, and resolving OSCAL content. This appears to be dead code that should be removed to maintain code cleanliness.
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentresults/AssessmentResultsCommand.javasrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ssp/SystemSecurityPlanCommand.javasrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/profile/ProfileCommand.javasrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/poam/PlanOfActionsAndMilestonesCommand.javasrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/catalog/CatalogCommand.javasrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/componentdefinition/ComponentDefinitionCommand.javasrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentplan/AssessmentPlanCommand.java🔗 Analysis chain
Clarify the status of the commented-out RenderSubcommand.
The presence of a commented-out command handler raises questions:
- Is this a planned feature?
- Should this comment be removed if the feature is not planned?
- If planned, should there be a TODO with a ticket reference?
Let's check if there are any related issues or implementations:
Let me search for the actual RenderSubcommand implementation to understand if this is a planned feature or dead code.
Based on the results so far, I can see that the commented-out RenderSubcommand appears consistently across multiple command classes, but there's no implementation found. Let me check if there's any documentation or related code that might explain this pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for RenderSubcommand implementations or references rg -l "RenderSubcommand" # Search for related issues in comments rg -i "render.*command|render.*subcommand"Length of output: 1827
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for RenderSubcommand class definition ast-grep --pattern 'class RenderSubcommand' # Search for any render-related TODOs or implementation notes rg -i "todo.*render|implement.*render"Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check README or documentation for render functionality fd README -e md -X cat {} # Look for render-related code or interfaces rg -A 3 "interface.*Render|class.*Render"Length of output: 4621
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractResolveCommand.java (1)
165-170: 💡 Codebase verification
Implementation needs test coverage for --relative-to option
The implementation of the
--relative-tooption is present but lacks dedicated test coverage. Specific concerns:
- No test cases found validating the
--relative-tofunctionality- Missing edge case tests for URI resolution scenarios
- No verification of relative path generation behavior
Please add test cases to cover:
- Basic relative path resolution
- Edge cases with different URI formats
- Error handling for invalid URI inputs
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the implementation meets requirements.
The implementation of
--relative-tooption appears complete, but let's verify it handles all edge cases mentioned in issue #84.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for tests covering the --relative-to option # Look for test files echo "Searching for test files..." fd -e java -e xml test # Search for test cases using the --relative-to option echo "Searching for test cases..." rg -l "relative-to" --type java --type xmlLength of output: 516
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the test coverage and implementation details # Check test class for resolution tests echo "=== Checking test coverage ===" rg -A 10 "class CLITest" src/test/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/CLITest.java # Look for the original issue description echo -e "\n=== Checking issue description ===" gh issue view 84 # Check command line option definition echo -e "\n=== Checking CLI option definition ===" rg "RELATIVE_TO" src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractResolveCommand.javaLength of output: 1965
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the complete option definition and linked issue # Check the full option definition echo "=== Checking complete RELATIVE_TO option definition ===" rg -B 5 -A 5 "Option RELATIVE_TO" src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractResolveCommand.java # Check the linked issue #78 echo -e "\n=== Checking linked issue #78 ===" gh issue view 78 # Look for any resolution tests echo -e "\n=== Checking for resolution tests ===" rg -l "resolve|resolution" src/test/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/Length of output: 3210
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/catalog/ConvertSubcommand.java (1)
13-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add @deprecated annotation to match Javadoc.
While the Javadoc indicates this class is deprecated, the
@Deprecatedannotation is missing. This annotation is important for compile-time warnings and tooling support.Add the annotation before the class declaration:
/** * Provides an OSCAL content conversion command. * <p> * This executor provides user feedback stating that this command is deprecated * in favor of the {@link ConvertCommand}. */ +@Deprecated(since = "1.0.0", forRemoval = true) public class ConvertSubcommandCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentplan/ConvertSubcommand.java (1)
13-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add @deprecated annotation for consistency.
Similar to the catalog version, this class needs the
@Deprecatedannotation to match its Javadoc deprecation notice.Add the annotation before the class declaration:
/** * Provides an OSCAL content conversion command. * <p> * This executor provides user feedback stating that this command is deprecated * in favor of the {@link ConvertCommand}. */ +@Deprecated(since = "1.0.0", forRemoval = true) public class ConvertSubcommand📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Provides an OSCAL content conversion command. * <p> * This executor provides user feedback stating that this command is deprecated * in favor of the {@link ConvertCommand}. */ @Deprecated(since = "1.0.0", forRemoval = true)src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ssp/ConvertSubcommand.java (1)
13-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance deprecation documentation and add @deprecated annotation
While the Javadoc indicates this class is deprecated, the implementation is missing several key elements for proper deprecation:
- Add the
@Deprecatedannotation- Include
@sincetag to indicate when it was deprecated- Add
@forRemovalto indicate if/when it will be removed- Provide migration guidance in the Javadoc
Here's the suggested implementation:
/** * Provides an OSCAL content conversion command. * <p> * This executor provides user feedback stating that this command is deprecated * in favor of the {@link ConvertCommand}. + * + * @deprecated since 1.0.0, for removal in 2.0.0. Use {@link ConvertCommand} instead. + * Migration guide: Replace usage of this class with {@link ConvertCommand} and + * specify the content type as "ssp" when executing the command. */ +@Deprecated(since = "1.0.0", forRemoval = true) public class ConvertSubcommand📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Provides an OSCAL content conversion command. * <p> * This executor provides user feedback stating that this command is deprecated * in favor of the {@link ConvertCommand}. * * @deprecated since 1.0.0, for removal in 2.0.0. Use {@link ConvertCommand} instead. * Migration guide: Replace usage of this class with {@link ConvertCommand} and * specify the content type as "ssp" when executing the command. */ @Deprecated(since = "1.0.0", forRemoval = true) public class ConvertSubcommandsrc/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/assessmentresults/ConvertSubcommand.java (1)
13-18: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Systematic deprecation inconsistencies found across ConvertSubcommand implementations
All ConvertSubcommand implementations (AssessmentPlan, AssessmentResults, Catalog, ComponentDefinition, POAM, SSP) mention deprecation in their Javadoc comments but lack the required
@Deprecatedannotation. Only the Profile implementation is missing both the annotation and deprecation documentation.
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/profile/ConvertSubcommand.java: Missing both annotation and deprecation documentation- All other ConvertSubcommand implementations: Missing
@Deprecatedannotation while having deprecation documentation🔗 Analysis chain
Verify and systematically update all ConvertSubcommand implementations
This class has the same deprecation documentation issues as the SSP implementation. We should ensure consistent deprecation handling across all command implementations.
Let's verify all similar implementations:
Apply the same deprecation enhancement pattern as suggested for the SSP implementation to maintain consistency across all command implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all ConvertSubcommand implementations and check their deprecation status # Find all ConvertSubcommand files echo "Checking all ConvertSubcommand implementations..." fd -e java ConvertSubcommand.java | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" # Check for @Deprecated annotation echo "Has @Deprecated annotation?" rg "@Deprecated" "$file" || echo "No @Deprecated annotation found" # Check for deprecation in Javadoc echo "Deprecation documentation:" rg -A 5 "@deprecated|deprecated" "$file" || echo "No deprecation documentation found" echo doneLength of output: 6270
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/componentdefinition/ConvertSubcommand.java (1)
11-11: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Documentation needed for the unified ConvertCommand
The new
ConvertCommandlacks sufficient documentation and migration guidance:
- The command description is minimal and doesn't explain the unified nature of the command
- No deprecation notice is present in the old
ConvertSubcommand- No migration examples are provided in the documentation
- The README mentions conversion capabilities but doesn't detail the command usage
Required documentation updates:
- Add
@Deprecatedannotation toConvertSubcommandwith migration instructions- Enhance
ConvertCommandJavadoc with detailed usage examples- Update README.md with examples of the new unified convert command
- Add a migration guide for users transitioning from specific subcommands
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation and examples for the new ConvertCommand
While deprecating this command in favor of
ConvertCommand, we should ensure the new command is well-documented with migration examples.Let's verify the documentation of the new command:
Consider adding a dedicated migration guide in the project documentation to help users transition from the deprecated command-specific implementations to the new unified
ConvertCommand.Also applies to: 13-18
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check documentation of the new ConvertCommand # Find and examine ConvertCommand documentation echo "Checking ConvertCommand documentation..." rg -l "class ConvertCommand" | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" # Extract class documentation ast-grep --pattern 'class ConvertCommand { $$$ }' "$file" done # Check for usage examples in documentation files echo "Checking for migration examples..." fd -e md -e adoc | xargs rg -l "ConvertCommand"Length of output: 604
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to check the documentation and implementation # Check for Javadoc comments and class implementation echo "=== Checking ConvertCommand implementation and documentation ===" rg -A 20 "class ConvertCommand" # Check for usage examples in README or docs echo -e "\n=== Checking README and documentation files ===" fd "README" | xargs cat fd -t f -d 1 "docs" | xargs cat # Check for command-line help text echo -e "\n=== Checking command-line help text ===" rg -B 3 "@Command\(name = \"convert\""Length of output: 8570
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for command annotations and help text in both the old and new implementations # Check command annotations and descriptions in both files echo "=== Checking command annotations and descriptions ===" rg -B 5 "@Command" src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/componentdefinition/ConvertSubcommand.java echo -e "\n=== Checking new ConvertCommand annotations ===" rg -B 5 "@Command" src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ConvertCommand.java # Check for any migration or deprecation notices echo -e "\n=== Checking for deprecation notices ===" rg "@Deprecated|@deprecated" src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/componentdefinition/ConvertSubcommand.java # Check for any usage examples in test files echo -e "\n=== Checking for usage examples in tests ===" fd -e java -p "test" | xargs rg "ConvertCommand|ConvertSubcommand"Length of output: 2742
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ssp/ValidateSubcommand.java (1)
32-32: 💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent exception handling in validation hierarchy
The verification reveals an inconsistency in the exception handling. While
SAXExceptionhas been removed fromValidateSubcommand.getOscalXmlSchemas(), it's still declared in the abstract base classAbstractOscalValidationCommand. This creates a mismatch in the exception contract between the base class and its implementation.
AbstractOscalValidationCommand.java: Method declaresthrows IOException, SAXExceptionValidateSubcommand.java: Method only declaresthrows IOExceptionThis change should either be reverted to maintain consistency with the base class, or the base class should be updated to remove the
SAXExceptiondeclaration.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify exception handling consistency across validation commands
The removal of
SAXExceptionfrom the method signature suggests that XML parsing exceptions are now handled internally. This change aligns with the broader refactoring of exception handling in the validation framework.Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining SAXException declarations in validation commands # and verify the exception handling pattern in AbstractOscalValidationCommand # Search for any remaining SAXException declarations in validation commands echo "Checking for remaining SAXException declarations:" rg "throws.*SAXException" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands" # Check the base class implementation for exception handling pattern echo "Checking base class implementation:" rg -A 10 "getOscalXmlSchemas" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractOscalValidationCommand.java"Length of output: 1190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation of getOscalXmlSchemas in the ValidateSubcommand class # and its hierarchy to understand how SAXException is handled # First, check the ValidateSubcommand implementation echo "Checking ValidateSubcommand implementation:" rg -A 10 "getOscalXmlSchemas.*throws" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ssp/ValidateSubcommand.java" # Check for any try-catch blocks handling SAXException in ValidateSubcommand echo -e "\nChecking for SAXException handling in ValidateSubcommand:" rg -B 2 -A 5 "catch.*SAXException" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ssp/ValidateSubcommand.java" # Check for any try-catch blocks handling SAXException in AbstractOscalValidationCommand echo -e "\nChecking for SAXException handling in AbstractOscalValidationCommand:" rg -B 2 -A 5 "catch.*SAXException" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractOscalValidationCommand.java" # Check if there are any other validation commands that might show the pattern echo -e "\nChecking other validation commands implementation:" fd -e java . "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands" --exec rg -l "getOscalXmlSchemas.*throws"Length of output: 2385
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation of XmlSchemaContentValidator to see how SAXException is handled internally # Check XmlSchemaContentValidator constructor and related methods echo "Checking XmlSchemaContentValidator implementation:" rg -B 2 -A 10 "class XmlSchemaContentValidator" --type java # Check for SAXException handling in XmlSchemaContentValidator echo -e "\nChecking for SAXException handling in XmlSchemaContentValidator:" rg -B 2 -A 5 "catch.*SAXException" --type java # Let's also check ValidateCommand implementation for context echo -e "\nChecking ValidateCommand implementation:" rg -A 10 "getOscalXmlSchemas.*throws" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/ValidateCommand.java"Length of output: 1068
src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/componentdefinition/ValidateSubcommand.java (1)
32-32: 💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent exception handling detected in validation command hierarchy
The parent class
AbstractOscalValidationCommandstill declaresSAXExceptionin its method signature while the child classValidateSubcommandhas removed it. This creates an inconsistency in the inheritance hierarchy.
AbstractOscalValidationCommand.java: Method declaresthrows IOException, SAXExceptionValidateSubcommand.java: Method only declaresthrows IOException🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistent exception handling across validation commands.
The removal of
SAXExceptionfrom the method signature aligns with the broader refactoring of validation commands.Let's verify consistent exception handling across all validation commands:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent exception handling in validation commands # Look for any remaining SAXException declarations in validation-related files rg -l "throws.*SAXException" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands"Length of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual usage of SAXException in AbstractOscalValidationCommand.java rg -A 5 "throws.*SAXException" "src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/commands/AbstractOscalValidationCommand.java" # Also check if ValidateSubcommand extends AbstractOscalValidationCommand ast-grep --pattern 'class ValidateSubcommand extends AbstractOscalValidationCommand'Length of output: 328
src/test/java/gov/nist/secauto/oscal/tools/cli/core/CLITest.java (1)
231-232:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd test coverage for the new
--relative-tofunctionality.While the added test for
metaschema metapath list-functionsis good, there's no test coverage for the new--relative-to=URIargument being added to theresolvecommand.Would you like me to help generate test cases for the new
--relative-tofunctionality?
david-waltermire
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai regenerate the PR summary |
|
@david-waltermire, I will regenerate the AI-generated summary for the pull request as you requested. ✅ Actions performedSummary regeneration triggered. |
|
@david-waltermire, I will regenerate the PR summary as per your request. ✅ Actions performedSummary regeneration triggered. |
david-waltermire
force-pushed
the
feature/84-relative-to
branch
from
2455514 to
46d5aa6
Compare
…t relative generated links during profile resolution. Resolves metaschema-framework#84.
aj-stein-gsa
force-pushed
the
feature/84-relative-to
branch
from
46d5aa6 to
f3f4d17
Compare
Committer Notes
Added the
--relative-to=URIargument to theresolvecommand to support relative generated links during profile resolution.Resolves #84.
Depends on metaschema-framework/liboscal-java#94.
All Submissions:
By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.
Changes to Core Features:
Summary by CodeRabbit
RELATIVE_TOoption.