Add ignore_direct radio option

[Jorropo]

What does this PR do?

This allows to support a new option which I am using to test meshing when nodes are meters apart.

Checklist before merging

• All top level messages commented
• All enum members have unique descriptions

[thebentern]

Since this is not something generally useful, you probably just need to keep this change in your local clone of protos.

[Jorropo]

I actually just pushed meshtastic/firmware#5511 after rewriting the code to use the newer relayer last byte id which is actually the thing I want to test.
I would usually not care about merging in protos for stuff like this given this is firmware's private config API except the fact it's how you configure the firmware and I want that feature in firmware ✨.

[GUVWAF]

In meshtastic/firmware#5511 you're not checking the relay_node byte (which is not yet in use), but the last byte of the original transmitter (from).

Also, I don't really see the use of this outside of testing the mesh protocol, which I find much easier to do in simulation.

[Jorropo]

In meshtastic/firmware#5511 you're not checking the relay_node byte (which is not yet in use), but the last byte of the original transmitter (from).

🤦 meant relay node.

Also, I don't really see the use of this outside of testing the mesh protocol, which I find much easier to do in simulation.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ok